True at True Associates

Request to visit my sister blog, Online True Stories.

2012-01-28T12:09:00.000-08:00

Note to my readers: I’dlike to reintroduce, or should I say promote, my sister blog – Online TrueStories.com/.

I have a couple of new items posted on that blog.

First, I’ve continued with my short stories. The most recent entry is titled Tom Shannon, the FBI and the Witch. Perhaps, some of you will be interested. Also, I encourage you to sign-up to receivenotifications of new posts on that blog. That will save you the trouble of periodically checking back to see ifthere are updates.

Secondly, I’m trying a new feature that relates to creativewriting; with, hopefully, reader participation. How it works: approximately oncea month I will post a photograph. I’dlike readers to write a mini-story about the photograph – 150 words or less. And, I plan to give a prize to the winner ofthe best story. I will try this for acouple of months. If there is nointerest, I won’t continue to bore you with the concept – and will drop it. However, I hope there is some interest. It could be fun.

It is sunny today in Portland.

Best wishes to all of you, and thank you for dropping by.

True Nelson

Thoughts on Kyron Horman, David Durham, and Doitchen Krastev

2012-01-25T11:10:00.000-08:00

True’s Miscellany: Ihope those of you who bother to read my posted opinions also check-out thecomments. They can be very informativeand articulate.

I have recently received questions about Sheriff Dan Staton’s(Multnomah County SO) statements early on in the Kyron Horman investigation; towit the Sheriff referring to related information uncovered, includinginformation that they (allegedly the authorities) wished they did not know.

It was, I agree, a strange comment. I might use the metaphor here that theSheriff was like a deer caught in the headlights. I suppose that he was speakingextemporaneously – while attempting to project compassion and sincerity. Regarding things that he wished he did notknow, my current guess would be that he was referring to generalizedinformation about child trafficking and abuse that he, and all of us, wouldfind heartrending. Nonetheless, this wasnot something that a Sheriff should say in a press conference, during a veryactive investigation, without elaborating. When no elaboration was forthcoming, the implication for the public was,perhaps, we need someone in charge of the investigation who is not quite so ‘sensitive,’and that we want our investigators to know everything that might have somerelevance to this inquiry or other inquiries. My initialreaction to his comments was that law enforcement was close to a solution and arecovery. That initial opinion, on mypart, was apparently far from accurate - in that the Kyron investigation has not seemed to significantly progresssince the Sheriff made those rather awkward comments.

Here I might add something about the news media coverage. Have you noted that the Oregonian reporterscovering the David Durham case, or the Kyron Horman case for that matter, seemto be entirely satisfied with receiving the latest law enforcement briefing,without doing any independent investigation? This was especially evident in the recent Oregonian article about David Durham– nothing really new, just a rehash of old information.

One of my readers very smartly stated some follow-up thatoutlined what the Oregonian reporters needed to do.

“Previousarticles said that David Durham was on the north coast at a work colleague’sparty in Manzanita. He skipped work on the Friday before, was he planning to goto work on Monday? What else WAS going on with him, why would someone set-out,at this time of year, down the coast highway in the dark & bad weather? It’snot commonly done.
Why have no details been released about that party, interviews with the otherpartygoers, explanations for why he left and drove south instead of east.”

True’s Response: Lawenforcement will give the press the typical boilerplate; and, if the pressappears satisfied, they will go no further. I don’t think it is a misrepresentation to say that the Oregonianreporters, when it comes to criminal investigations, are remiss in many ways. It is the responsibility of reporters topress the authorities for information – hence the word ‘press.’ This is also what good investigators do. They need to push for information, not justaccept what is handed to them.

Another reader referred to the Doitchen Krastev case,previously discussed in this blog. Said reader furnished some interestinginformation. The information appears tobe accurate.

“Notto resurrect a dead story, but there are a couple of issues with the originalanonymous questions and comments in this post.

1. The Anarchist Cookbook contained the basics on how Krastev obtained his fakeID and was quite available on BBSes and other pre-internet networks. It went throughthe computer underground in the early 90s. I had a copy by 1995 and I wasbarely in high school at the time.

2. Krastev’s parents were intellectuals, whether they were nonmenklatura, isuncertain. No information as far as I’m aware of has established, beyondspeculation, that the parents were committed to the communist party. His motherbasically brought Jungian psychotherapy to Bulgaria. His father is theExecutive Director of the Central Library.

3. As of today he’s been released from Taft Correctional Camp and is in INScustody. I would assume that had he been a spy there would have been a muchfaster deportation to Bulgaria,like the Russian 10.”

True’s Response: TheRussian 10 were returned to Russiain an expedited manner for a couple of reasons (I believe): embarrassment to the US security services for allowing this tocontinue for so long; and as a token offered to a quasi-ally of ours, the new Russia. Within a few weeks of their capture, theRussian 10 were old news, and most Americans had forgotten about them. They did, however, return to their homelandand a heroes’ welcome. My feeling isthat there are many more like the Russian 10 still acting as ‘sleepers’ withinthe U.S.– probably hundreds from many countries. Another reason, if we really require another, to secure our borders.

Krastev may be currently being held because they do not knowwhat to do with him. Bulgaria maynot want him back. Or, Krastev may beclaiming that he would be in danger if he was forced to go back. Moreover, Krastev could, possibly, serve as anegotiating chip. Who is to say? My feeling is that, ultimately, he will beallowed to remain in the U.S.

True Nelson

David Durham Wanted for Shooting Officer Steven Dobbs

2012-01-23T21:55:00.000-08:00

The Oregonian, front page, instant date, had an updated articleon the Steven Dobbs (Lincoln City Police Officer) shooting by David Durham on1/24/11 – a year ago. Policeinvestigators admit there is nothing particularly new in the case. Durhamescaped a massive manhunt that night, as well as the subsequent days, and hasn’tbeen seen since.

I’ve discussed this case in the past on my blog. However, I would like to emphasize howextraordinary this Durhamsituation is and has been. Let’s consider someaspects:

Although Durham was, according to friends and acquaintances, acting somewhat strange in the days or weeks before the shooting – with indications of paranoia – there seems to be no explanation as to why the adverse change in his behavior. An unexplainable psychotic episode? Perhaps. Was he under the influence of prescription drugs and possible non-prescription drugs for pain, or simply recreation? Considering everything that occurred, that's a bit of a stretch. Or, was he involved in something, something criminal, which agitated him to the point of fearing law enforcement? Hard to say. Or was it a combination of possibilities?
It is unusual for someone to shoot a police officer where there appears to be no obvious explanation. It does, nonetheless, happen. That said, a psychotic episode and/or drugs generally would limit, considerably, your ability to escape capture – much less disappear without a trace.
Some in law enforcement have opined that he “tried to swim across the bay and just didn’t make it.” Law enforcement went on to say that 50% of the time the water gives up the dead, and 50% of the time bodies are never recovered. I did search and rescue on a sheriff’s office, and found that a much higher percentage of bodies are recovered – nearer 100%. I acknowledge that my experience was mainly with rivers and lakes, not a near costal area. But, it seems to me incredible that a person would chance swimming, in the middle of night, across a body of water of which he reportedly knew little. And what about his gun or guns, did he just throw them in the water before taking the swim? Yes, I know. Anything is possible. I think if he is dead, it is just as likely, or more so, that he ran into the woods and shot himself.
However, I am not convinced that he is dead. I think it is possible that he received help in escaping the area.
What was not explained in the article was: What was Durham doing on the coast? And was he planning to meet someone? 11:30PM was when the shooting occurred. Really? That doesn’t sound like he’s on vacation or just sight-seeing.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman Update / January 2012

2012-01-21T15:20:00.000-08:00

Regarding Kyron, I feel a little guilty that I haven’tspoken of him lately. Nothing much isnew in the investigation – as far as we know.

The most significant development, in recent months, is thatthe judge overseeing the divorce and custody proceedings involving Terri Horman, Kaine Horman and their young daughter has extended the ‘restraining order’ against Terri for anotheryear – apparently based on the pending allegations against Terri. Judges would not take such drastic actionagainst a mother unless the presumptive evidence is considerable. As we know, this restraining order limitsTerri’s contact with her daughter. For the normal mother, this would be a terrible consequence.

As I understand it, Terri Moulton Horman remains a virtualprisoner in her parents’ home located in Roseburg. She seems to be biding her time – waiting forwhat I am not sure. I guess expectingthat all of this will blow over one day soon.

I know some of you are very defensive of Terri. Some of you defend her based on good anddecent hearts. Some of you seem entirelyclueless as to how society works – is supposed to work. Mothers protect their children – at allcosts. Even to the extent of sacrificingtheir own lives. This is nature’s way. In Terri’s case something does not ring true,and I think it is obvious to most of us. Terri has been playing this game to almost absurd lengths – the reticentinnocent who must defend herself against unfounded and fabricated allegations. There can be only one reason for that.

If Terri is truly innocent, what information could shepossibly furnish to the authorities, about Kyron, that would in anyone’swildest imagination assist the prosecution in railroading her into a prison cell? Why would you hire a top-notch and veryexpensive criminal defense attorney like Steve Houze even before beingdesignated a suspect in the case? Somewill say she is on defense due to the alleged murder-for-hire plot. Sorry folks, I just can’t buy it. That case is obviously so weak that lawenforcement has chosen not to pursue it – and who knows where the landscaper isthese days.

I don’t know how long this will continue. I don’t know why the Sheriff’s Office is somute – especially in view of the Sheriff’s glibness early on.

I suppose law enforcement is waiting for Terri to break ordie of old age. Many of us will not liveto see the latter.

True Nelson

Personal Thoughts on Birds and Winter

2012-01-17T09:36:00.000-08:00

Forgive me if I digress into more personal reflections – notnecessarily blog theme related.

It is snowing here in Portland. Presently, we have only a dusting on theground. More is expected over the nextfew days. It’s beautiful. I’ve been out to feed the birds, and am nowenjoying a cup of tea (Darjeelingis my preference). Silly comments Iknow.

As you may have noted, I’ve been attempting to expand myonline presence into other areas – kind of wandering in the dark and trying tofind topics, subjects that might interest both me and my readers. This Google Analytics capability is a bit ofa curse, because one is able to follow the readers’ interest too closely as itwaxes and wanes. What is tremendouslygratifying is receiving comments of encouragement from some readers – as wellas the interest apparent in some other countries. However, it puts a bit of pressure on me to producesomething worthwhile.

Today, at the moment, I was thinking about birds andwinter. Here in Portland our winters are relativelymild. However, in my earlier career, Itraveled extensively. I remembervisiting Saint Cloud, Minnesota during a very cold snap – not unusualfor there. I was temporarily stranded inmy third story motel room. Earlier, Ihad tried to start my rental car with negative results. One of the managers at the facility I wasvisiting promised to come and pick me up – late morning – and transport me tothe mill. I was wiling-away my timereading USA Today and looking out my window. I don’t remember what the temperature was outside, but the weather forecasterssaid the temperature was life threatening – if you happened to be stranded inyour car. Having briefly been outsideearlier in my attempts to get my car started, there was no doubt that someonefrom Oregon, improperly attired for the harsh Minnesota winter, wouldnot survive long if required to be exposed to the elements. The cold was brutal, incredible andunforgiving.

I looked out on the adjacent roof, one floor down. There was a brick chimney spouting volumes ofsmoke, probably steam or a combination of smoke and steam, from the restaurantbelow. Every once in awhile, a gust ofwind would sweep the smoke away and reveal the chimney’s rim. It was an amazing site. There were birds, shoulder to shoulder,without an inch to spare, perched on the rim of the chimney. You could see them briefly, and then theywere totally enveloped by the smoke. They were surviving as best they could. Why they hadn’t flown to Florida– never to return – I do not know.

Which brings me to a question for my readers in Minnesota or Wisconsin,how on earth do birds survive your winter with no real food source and noaccess to water? And, of course, thelarger question is: How do you survive?

True Nelson

True's Thoughts / The Thomas Sowell Reader

2012-01-14T17:27:00.000-08:00

I have been doing a lot of reading lately. It’s that time of year in Portland when we residents wait patiently(sometimes not so patiently) for things to dry-up and warm-up just a bit. There are lots of outdoor activities in thisarea, but snow doesn’t particularly excite me anymore. I prefer a warm golf course. So, now is the time to curl up with a book. ‘Curl up with a book’ is such a cliché Iknow. And, sort of a girly thing tosay. I don’t really curl up – more likea comfortable chair and a good light. Ilike to read, mainly non-fiction. Itseems like there is so much to learn and so little time.

In that regard, I just finished an outstanding book. I’m not suggesting that you put this book onhold with your local library. I amsuggesting, however, that you buy it. Itis something you will undoubtedly want to read time and again. The book is The Thomas Sowell Reader copyright 2011. Mr. Sowell is aneconomics professor, currently a scholar in residence at the HooverInstitution, Stanford University – as well as asyndicated columnist. The book is a seriesof essays covering social issues like crime, poverty, affirmative action, minimumwage, growing old, equality, children (early education, Autism and the EinsteinSyndrome), as well as numerous other subjects. If the thought of an Economics Professor makes your eyes glaze over,think of him as a professor of life experiences. Mr. Sowell, raised in Harlem,is incredibly insightful about many aspects of the human condition, and a veryreadable author.

Do I agree with everything he says? No. DoI find his opinions edifying? Yes,absolutely.

True Nelson

New Short Story Posted / for those interested / Titled - "Abuse"

2012-01-09T21:34:00.000-08:00

I would like to reiterate:

Abuse - a short story by True Nelson

This new story, titled ‘Abuse,’ is about child abuse. It is not for everyone. It is a dark story. It is fiction. It is, however, an amalgamation of incidents I’ve investigated, indirectly witnessed, and official reports that I’ve read. For the sensitive it is difficult to read. It was considerably more difficult to write.

True Nelson

Releasing Another Short Story - shortly. This story is about child abuse.

2012-01-07T12:59:00.000-08:00

In the next couple of days, I plan to release my fourthshort story. I hope you have had anopportunity to read the first three. Asyou will note, a common thread runs through all the stories as well as a certaincontinuity. You will find those storieson my other blog – Online True Stories.

This new story, titled ‘Abuse,’ is about child abuse. It is not for everyone. It is a dark story. It is fiction. It is, however, an amalgamation of incidentsI’ve investigated, indirectly witnessed, and official reports that I’ve read. For the sensitive it is difficult toread. It was considerably more difficultto write.

Child abuse is a subject that I would like to explore inmore detail on my blog to include the many failures on the part of thoseofficials pledged to protect children.

I am a former volunteer at the Oregon Humane Society. And, I was impressed by the caring andconcern, as well as the actions, of this very deserving agency. It is unfortunate, in my opinion, that animalabuse – when called to the Humane Society’s attention – is apparently morethoroughly and actively investigated than a situation of child abuse, when calledto the attention of the child protective services. Why is that? Well, in part, many more wrong-headed laws protect the actions ofabusive parents at the expense of the defenseless children. Secondly, the authorities who deal with childabuse continually cry that they are understaffed and poorly paid. Whereas, the Humane Society does more withless – principally due to their hundreds of volunteers and the generous publicsupport.

Well, more on this at another time.

True Nelson

Proposed Prison Reform / Prisons are just too damned expensive.

2011-12-30T21:01:00.000-08:00

Here we go again. Regarding Friday’s Oregonian article (12/30/11): “Panel Pushes Prison Reform” – “an Oregon commission saysretooling sentencing using modern research will save money.”

This so-called commission, appointed by our dilettante governor,John Kitzhaber, rendered their first major recommendation which was that said appointedcommission requires additional members and that the requested review of theprison system will necessarily be continued for an additional year. Sounds expensive, doesn’t it?

So far, when you read what was released in the commission’sinitial report, they’ve determined that recidivism would be greatly reduced ifthe prisoners received additional vocational training. I don’t buy it. What the commission is ultimately promotingunder the table is the reduction of mandatory sentencing because it is just toocostly for the State. They do mentionthat the crime rate seems to be going down; presumably, according to thecommission, because criminals just aren’t as bad as they used to be. Could it be that the worst criminals areincarcerated, and that’s why the public feels a little safer?

I’m not an expert on the prison system, but I think I’veprobably had more experience in that area then Governor Kitzhaber. I was a jailer in a county jail at onetime. I’ve had personal contact with anumber of criminals – some who have chosen crime as a life-longprofession. And, for what it’s worth I’vetoured a couple of the major State prisons, and talked to the staff. Slim experience, I know; but I do have somesuggestions.

If there is a major spectrum of crimes, and relatedpunishments, that need revision, it is in the area of illegal drugs. We simply should no longer clog our prisonswith individuals who are principally illegal drug users, and themselvesvictimized by their own addiction. I’maware that many users also sell drugs – and in fact most do. Our laws need to recognize the intent – is itto sustain addiction or to victimize others? Not easily ascertained, but possible. It’s time that the public recognized the war on drugs, if not over, isbut limping along. The main caveat Iwould put forward is that minors must be protected.

What about the ‘death penalty?’ I’m a proponent of death for the most horrendousmurders. However, I do not favor thesystem wherein a jury is compelled to make this life or death decision for society. My suggestion is that all murderers, convictedin the first degree, be given the sentence of life in prison without chance ofparole or the death penalty by lethal injection. They choose. If they choose life in prison, that’s fine. If, at some point, they change their mindsand request the lethal injection, the State should accommodate them. Barbaric? I don’t think so. I think it ishumane.

In that regard, currently, Gary Haugen, a resident on Oregon’s death row hasbeen asking to be executed for months. Against his wishes, the appeals on his behalf have gone on and on whileattorneys rack-up fees at the expense of the taxpayers. Our Governor has decided to take the easy wayout. He’s decided that, even thoughOregonians voted overwhelming for the ‘death penalty,’ he will not permitexecutions as long as he is governor. Inother words, he refuses to do the job for which he was elected. To put this bluntly, it appears to me thatGary Haugen has bigger balls than John Kitzhaber, who refuses to enforce thelaw.

What about recidivism rates for crimes other than murder? Common sense tells us that vocationaltraining for criminals, welding, wood working, etc. isn’t going to changeanything. Why would an individual, witha propensity for crime, want to get up at six in the morning and go to work asa welder when he can make easier money by burglary, robbery, etc.? All his friends are doing crime, why shouldhe change his ways? Not only is it noteconomically viable as far as he is concerned, all his friends would think he’s achump.

My suggestion is this. OK, we’ll give you vocational training, and we will even release yousomewhat early with no parole requirements – providing, you leave the State of Oregon and Oregon’scontiguous states – and establish residence elsewhere. If you return to Oregon or an adjacent state, you will be incarceratedand required to complete your original sentence – no exceptions, no more vocational training, just hard time. This will force the individual to start a newand more productive life somewhere else, without returning him or her to allthe bad influences that lead him to crime in the first place. Hell, I’d even help him with some relocationexpenses. Are we just shipping ourproblems somewhere else? No, I don’tthink so. We’re giving a former prisonera possibility of a new life. Take yourfamily and move away from those mean streets. Start a new life and God speed.

True Nelson

To My Readers, A Holiday Wish for Peace and Joy

2011-12-24T13:54:00.000-08:00

I want to wish all my readers (both of them) a very happyand peaceful Christmas season surrounded by friends and family. And, a Happy New Year.

I truly enjoy the interaction I have had with my readers (Ibelieve there are probably more than two); and I thank you for allowing me theopportunity to communicate with you – if only for a fleeting moment. In return, I’ve received some intelligentthoughts from readers that have allowed me to look at things from a little differentperspective. On the other hand, somehave not taken kindly to my comments on certain subjects – and have reacted accordingly. Nonetheless, those comments are, in their ownway, worthwhile to me as a person. Atleast that is what I believe. Hopefully thenegatives will not overwhelm the positives, or I will feel compelled toseek-out other endeavors like watching too much TV.

The two subject areas from which I’ve received the most ‘blow-back’ are, of course, my comments about Terri Horman, and my commentsabout the unionization of our police and fire – both controversialsubjects. Interesting subjects, buthighly controversial – with strong support on both sides.

In this coming year, I plan to continue with this blog. In addition, I will be working on expandingmy secondary blog, Online True Stories. I have some new short stories coming up. I would like to start a poetry page. And, I would like to start a theme related photo section. Do any of you have any original, thoughtprovoking photos about law enforcement, the court system, mystery, etc.? For those of you who are actual poets, orgood photographers, my efforts may appear to be painfully amateurish. But, maybe some of you will offer to help bysubmitting your own theme-related poems and photos. We’ll see how that goes.

Questions or comments are always appreciated. You know you’ve hit my on-button if I commentat length on a subject you’ve offered.

Please drop back or sign up to be notified when there arenew posts.

Again, happy holidays,

True Nelson

Dangerous Instincts / How Gut Feelings Betray Us / Reviewed by True Nelson

2011-12-17T14:14:00.000-08:00

Some of my readers may find the following book not onlyinteresting but helpful. I wouldparticularly recommend the book to women and/or anyone who conducts interviewsand investigations on a consistent basis. I do, however, have some reservations which I will explain.

The book is DangerousInstincts / How Gut Feelings Betray Us by Mary Ellen O’Toole, PhD, withAlisa Bowman. Mary Ellen was a FBI SpecialAgent and ‘profiler’ for many years, and possesses a vast amount of experiencein recognizing and dealing with deviant behavior.

The book is a great resource for many. Ann Rule, whom we’re all familiar with,recommends the book very highly.

Reading the book, I began to feel sorry for Mary Ellen. I’m sure she had an interesting career. But, on the other hand, she was required toexplore the haunts and minds of the worst criminals imaginable – the mosthorrific serial killers and predators. That she has survived the experience in tact – if she has – is testamentto an exceptionally strong personality.

To me, the book begins to drag when it becomes clear thatshe strives, almost obsessively, to describe the potential dangers in the mostmundane aspects of everyday life. Nonetheless,I’m surprised that, after all she experienced and now being retired, she hasthe courage to leave her house. I’m surethat she is, and rightfully so, carrying a gun at all times. I would.

I guess the point that I would like to make is that noordinary human is psychologically programmed to experience horror, almostdaily, for decades. She visited thetorture chambers, she breathed the appalling odors, she viewed the awfulphotographs, she read the detailed reports, and then she spent hoursinterviewing the monsters.

Some of those in law enforcement are expert incompartmentalizing – whatever that means. Perhaps, Mary Ellen is one of those. Some, I suppose, are able to witness the most horrendous crime or tragicevent, and then go home and peacefully play with their children or grandchildrenor make love to their husband or wife without – apparently – those ghastlyimages flashing through their mind. Myexperiences pale in comparison to Mary Ellen’s, but some of my experiencesstill haunt me. It is clear that shefeels her former profession was rewarding and intellectually challenging. That’s good. That is as it should be. But, asI’ve said before, law enforcement or similar careers are not suitable foreveryone.

Anyway, this post is about the book. I recommend it. And, I wish Mary Ellen a peaceful retirement.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman Update / and Questions Answered

2011-12-09T22:10:00.001-08:00

I’d like to address two recent comments / questions receivedfrom readers.

Reader said: “There have been a couple of different blogsthat say the Kyron Horman case may have been a ‘rescue mission’ by Terri or theschool district to protect him from being abused. One of the blogs says LEknows this and backed away from investigating it because it was a family caseand not a criminal case and the abuse issues were being addressed. Any comments?”

True’s Response: Highlyunlikely, and I’d be willing to bet a large sum of money that this is nothingmore than someone’s fantasy theory. Ihave, at times, said that anything is possible in the Kyron inquiry. This theory is, however, an exception to thatrule.

Reader said: “You do not think he will be convicted inspite of the evidence and yet you wanted Terri Horman arrested and tried forcapital murder? I can't make any senseout of the way you think.”

True’s Response: Forthe sake of clarification, the reader is referring to some of my commentsregarding Jerry Sandusky (the Penn State investigation) (and taken out of context); and has related thatto a previous comment I posted concerning Terri Horman and my belief that sheshould be prosecuted without delay.

I thought that I had made this fairly clear in the past, butI need to reiterate my explanation and my, perhaps, off-hand comment regardingTerri Horman.

Kyron had been missing for more than a year when I made thatcomment. At the time I stated my beliefthat Terri (let’s face it – the principal suspect) should be brought intocourt, charged with a crime, tried – and let the chips fall where they may. Someone, a reader, promptly asked, ‘chargedwith what?’ And, I shot back with 'capital murder.' I’m sure this shockedsome people. Some others undoubtedlybreathed an ‘amen.’

Let me explain. Atthe time, I still believed there was an outside chance that Kyron wasalive. Law enforcement had continually,or at least they did previously, hint that they knew more about Kyron’sdisappearance from a public grade school then they were prepared torelease. Nonetheless, regarding theirinvestigation, they seemed at that juncture to be stalled somewhere in the ‘horselatitudes;’ and hoping, I’m guessing, that the public would ultimately loseinterest in the case.

Personally, I had evolved to the point, where I didn’treally care if Terri was convicted or not. My priority was concerning Kyron’s whereabouts. Secondarily, I wondered what the Sheriff’sOffice knew about the disappearance / abduction of a child from an elementaryschool. There comes a time when lawenforcement owes it to the public to release something, even a theory based ontheir best information. Was this apossible abduction by a stranger? Havethey eliminated that possibility? If so,how did they draw that conclusion? IsTerri an actual suspect, or is she not? Basically, is there a continuing danger to other children?

It seemed like the only way to get that information was toget Terri Horman into court, and to present the evidence – both for and againsther involvement in Kyron’s disappearance.

Since then, more time has passed; and we’ve really heardnothing from the Sheriff’s Office. TheFBI appears to have folded their tent. The task force exists only in name. The only conclusion we can draw from this silence is that they feelKyron is no longer alive.

Terri remains free; but living under a shadow.

What is the public to think? My answer. Kyron is no longer living;the whereabouts of his remains are unknown. Law enforcement is paralyzed with concerns that they might lose a highprofile case, resulting in some embarrassment and professional repercussions; and,therefore, they have decided to do nothing at all.

There is a saying in the military: ‘Lead, follow, or get out of the way.’ The Multnomah County Sheriff’s Office and theDistrict Attorney’s Office have chosen none of those options. And, folks, there is absolutely nothing wecan do about it. Well, there is one thing. We can express our opinions.

True Nelson

J. Edgar, the Movie / True Nelson Comments

2011-12-08T10:37:00.001-08:00

I went to see Clint Eastwood’s recent movie last night – J. Edgar. I’m not going to write a motion picturereview. There are so many good reviews already;the consensus being good acting, bad movie. My impression was that it was too long, too disjointed, and quitefrankly kind of boring.

In that I entered on duty as an Agent in 1971, right before J. Edgar Hoover died; I do havesome personal thoughts. Hoover had many faults. And, I think that any FBI Agent, who servedduring that period, if they are being honest, would agree. However, without question, he almostsingle-handedly brought law enforcement into the modern age. He created the most highly recognized lawenforcement agency in the world – and the most respected. He promoted / created the National CriminalInformation Center (NCIC), the centralized fingerprint system, the FBI NationalAcademy, as well as the FBI laboratory for scientific and forensicinvestigations which was the precursor to every CSI organization, real (as in actual lawenforcement) and imagined (as on TV) that have become so familiar to all of us. He was a remarkable man. His achievements were legendary.

That said, his life was that of a bureaucrat. In that he was very good at that particular functionexplains how he was able to survive as Director for nearly fifty years. Did he at times try to manipulate others inthat Washingtoncircle for his benefit and his agency’s benefit? Of course he did. Was he unique in that way? Of course not. Washington DC is and was dog-eat-dog, survivalof the fittest, where nice guys finish last. In protecting himself, he protected the Bureau.

Personally, my contact with Hoover was limited to seeing him walking downthe hall of FBI headquarters, generally in the company of his friend andimmediate subordinate, Clyde Tolson. Ihad heard all the stories about Hoover’salleged quick temper and capricious decisions, so I knew he was someone toavoid unless it was absolutely unavoidable. Was he gay? Was Tolson gay? I don’t know. I’ve talked to many who knew Hooverwell and worked closely with him – and they don’t know. It doesn’t really matter to me. Sadly, however, I imagine that it wouldmatter to Hooverand Tolson.

For so many in our society, motion pictures arehistory. Many are too lazy or too preoccupiedwith their personal lives to ferret out the truth. If truth be known about Hoover – it would probably make a ratherboring movie. Eastwood tried tojazz-it-up, Hoover’slife that is, and it was still pretty boring as far as I was concerned. If Eastwood had focused on one aspect of Hoover’s career, like theLindbergh kidnapping case, he probably could have made a pretty good movie. For me, I was initially very interested inthe Bolsheviks’ influence in the United States, but the movie quicklymoved on to other issues.

J. Edgar,the movie, finally evolved into the suspected relationship between Hoover and Tolson – allpure speculation – without a single witness to anything along those lines thatwere portrayed – pure fiction.

Men, it seems, can not work closely together, and be close confidantswithout being suspected of being homosexual. Mark Felt, former Associate Director under Hoover(and later ‘outed’ as Woodward and Bernstein’s ‘deep throat’ in the Watergateinvestigation) described Hooverand Tolson’s relationship as “brotherly,” which sounds plausible to me.

Women, on the other hand, mostly get a pass in this sexual orientation area; which prompts thequestion: If Hoover was gay, does thatmean that Helen Gandy was a lesbian? After all, she never married; and, reportedly, in her retirement she liked to go fishing. Iguess we will never know for sure.

On the bright side, I understand that some ‘progressive’ elementaryand secondary schools are now teaching classes in gay achievements inhistory. Well, that’s nice. Perhaps, Hoover will finally get some positive and untainted recognition.

True Nelson

A New Book by Ronald Kessler / The Secrets of the FBI

2011-12-06T14:41:00.001-08:00

I recently finished the book by Ronald Kessler which is titled The Secrets of the FBI. On the former Agents’ online network, they were warning-off cooperating with Kessler – assuming, I suppose, that he planned a hatchet job on the Bureau. As it turned out, Kessler didn’t require rank and file cooperation in that he was getting cooperation from the very top including Robert Mueller, the FBI Director, and some of the Director’s immediate subordinates.

It was an interesting read, and gave me some insight as to how the FBI has evolved over the years. Kessler referred, in passing, to the FBI Agents of my era as “cowboys” – which I don’t necessarily take as a put-down. Maybe, we were. But man for man, I would put that group up against the current Agents – anytime. Many of my era were combat veterans and x-cops; and generally tough guys. Now, it seems the priority is more on computer expertise, classroom smarts and ethnic appreciation, with a sprinkling of tough guys – when it comes to the selection process. As I’ve noted before in my postings, it is not unusual for the present-day FBI to send some ‘shooters’ with other Agents who have been tasked to carry out rather routine projects like serving a search warrant. The ‘shooters’ are there for the protection of the other Agents, I guess. I imagine it won’t be long until the typical FBI Agent does not even carry a gun. And, so it goes.

Other aspects of the book that I found somewhat unsettling are the Bureau’s world-wide mission, and their vast, seemingly unlimited budget. Makes me wonder what the CIA is doing overseas and why they require the FBI to be mucking about in their business. The Bureau has always had what were called Legats – Agents who were assigned to certain countries to coordinate investigations with another nation’s law enforcement. But the current FBI has gone well beyond that concept with the literal assignment of hundreds of Agents overseas; apparently in addition to the CIA, the DEA, the NSA, ICE and all the military intelligence organizations. Moreover, the NYPD is now assigning some of their investigators overseas. Wow, we must either have all the bases covered, or we have an awful lot of unnecessary redundancy. I think it is probably the latter.

Anyway, I think Mr. Kessler has done some remarkable research, and I do recommend his book.

True Nelson

"The Letter," a short story by True Nelson

2011-12-02T11:09:00.001-08:00

Readers, I just posted another short story on my sister blog onlinetruestories.com . This story istitled: “The Letter.” I hope some of you will take the time to readmy most recent effort.

Understandably, most of you who have followed this blog areinterested more in current events and actual cases; and the thought of reading a shortstory does not particularly peak your interest.

The short stories that I have written (and I’m hoping otherswill also participate) are theme related. Sometimes, you will be amazed at what you might learn about lawenforcement, the criminal justice system, investigations, and the personnel wholive them on a day to day basis. It isnot always pretty. Sometimes, it is veryugly and nearly defies description.

As far as potential participation by others, I would belooking for short stories, essays, photographs, and even poems that fit withinthe above described theme’s criteria.

I will certainly give everyone proper credit for their submissions. I would like to offer some sort of prize forthe ‘best’ submission during a given period – which may very well be a mutepoint if no one chooses to participate. We’ll see how that goes. Anywaycomments or advice are always appreciated.

Nonetheless, I will continue this particular blog - True at True Associates.

Regarding a recent question from a reader as to whether ornot I was aware of the “Franklin Scandal.” I did not recall it, but did some research. This occurred in Omaha in approximately 1990. This appears to be an interesting case, ahighly controversial case that was ultimately designated a hoax. Many believe it was not a hoax, but a cover-up.

True Nelson

Jerry Sandusky / Penn State University / Responsibility?

2011-11-30T12:02:00.001-08:00

Jerry Sandusky

I believe that Jerry Sandusky is a pedophile, but that doesn’tnecessarily mean that he will be convicted in a court of law.

All of you, I’m sure, have read about the child abuse andsexual assault scandal involving a former Penn Statedefensive football coach, Jerry Sandusky. I just finished reading the Grand Jury Summary of charges; and thereported testimony is damning and shocking to read. A subsequent trial will prove Sandusky’s guilt orinnocence. If proven, I hope Sandusky spends theremainder of his despicable and discredited life in prison.

I won’t go into all that the Grand Jury reported. I will attach a hyperlink so that you canread it yourself.

I have little sympathy for Joe Paterno, the revered HeadCoach of the Penn State football team. He is well into his eighties, I’m sure he hasbeen, in recent years, little more than a figure-head for recruitment and fundraising. As Sandusky’sformer boss, Paterno seemed to give only superficial consideration to thereports that Sandusky was a sexual predator whocontinued to use the allure of the football team, and the Penn Statefootball facilities, to victimize young boys. Paterno, now the winningest Division One Football Coach in history, hasfailed the test as a human being. Thatis something he can ponder for his last few years.

Penn State’s Athletic Director and others at the University who knew ofsuspicions involving Sandusky,and did little or nothing, were rightfully fired; and should never again workfor another university.

As far as Penn State is concerned, asthis all plays out, they will be punished big-time with civil suits and loss ofreputation.

My take is that proving what we all know, and what commonsense tells us, is often difficult to establish in court. It’s a given that witness testimony is oftenunreliable. As an Agent, I can recallinterviewing tellers in bank robberies. Often the tellers were within a few feet of the robber, but could tellme little or nothing about the robber’s description – even such characteristicsas the robber’s race. They would oftenfocus on the gun; but knowing little about guns their resulting statements wereof little value. ‘Was it an automatic ora revolver?’ Answer: ‘I’m not sure, what’s the difference.’ Sandusky’sdefense will be well funded, and they will rip into the witnesses – to thepoint where the witnesses won’t be able to keep their story straight; won’t beable to recall information, and will begin to fold under the pressure. These are the dreary, but inescapable aspectsof our justice system.

Police officers are trained to be good observers wherein itbecomes almost second nature. Theordinary citizen does not generally have that capability.

Example: Part of thegrand jury testimony involves Sanduskyhaving anal sex with a young boy in the athletics’ department shower. Allegedly, an eye-witness saw this. This witness will be grilled on whether ornot he saw anal penetration, or merely close hugging or ‘horsing around’. Even if said witness was in position to seethe penetration, most – if not trained – will avert their eyes. Or, in some instances, not believe theireyes.

And so it goes… justice often failing in the search forabsolute truth. I suppose this is how itshould be. I’m just not sure.

There are many failures in this case. Sanduskydemonstrated over many years behavior that is consistent with a pedophile,including what they refer to as ‘grooming.’ You cannot tell me that Sandusky’s wifeand close associates did not suspect Sandusky’sproclivities. They, nonetheless, choseto ignore their suspicions; and allow him to pursue his predatory nature.

Parents, if you’re reading this, it is up to you to protectyour children. Pedophiles like Sandusky, MichaelJackson, some in the priesthood, some in the boy scouts, and little leaguesparticipate in those venues for that very reason to be close to children, andthe resulting opportunity to exploit and use children. This is, of course, not the case with themajority that volunteer for these children endeavors. But, parents need to be vigilant. If not, you are also responsible for the harmthat befalls your child.

Grand Jury Summary / Jerry Sandusky

True Nelson

Readers Interaction / David Durham / Rudy Sanchez

2011-11-22T17:40:00.001-08:00

As you might havesurmised, I’ve been spending some time working on the set-up of my newblog: Online True Stories.

However, I wanted totake a few minutes and answer some past questions. Readers need to understand that I have anopinion based on my life experiences. That’s all. At times, my opinionis no more worthwhile than the reader’s own. And, some things I simply do notknow. Nonetheless, good PIs pridethemselves in finding answers, given the time and necessary resources.

What is interestingabout blogging is that when I do not know something, someone else justmight. Example: One reader asked whether or not David Durhamhad his own teeth. I didn’t know theanswer, but it could be important in identifying a fugitive. Another reader subsequently answered thatindeed Durhamdid have his own teeth. Now, I’mprepared to acknowledge that someone could have lied or fabricated the answer, butI also tend to believe that someone else out there would have challenged theinformation if it was inaccurate. We,you and I, have to do the best we can with what resources we have. Sometimes, I think those resources, this publicforum with the capability for anonymity, may be a better resource, at times, than what law enforcement possesses. Law enforcement often projects this ‘attitude’of sophisticated judgment and cold official isolation that is sometimes ‘off-putting’to those who might offer help.

Reader’s Question: “I want to see you write aboutRudy Sanchez and the MFH. If you havealready please direct me there.”

True’s Answer: Go to thisblog’s ‘search function’ and enter Sanchez. There are some comments about Sanchez that you might findinteresting. These are mostly commentsleft by readers. I also discussed theMurder for Hire conspiracy in December of 2010.

Reader’s Question: “The big problem I have with Durham shootingthe officer because he felt ‘targeted’ by corrupt cops is that shooting a copat point blank range for no discernable reason is a good way to go from beingtargeted by corrupt cops to being targeted by all cops. So shooting a cop wouldnot really solve his problem.”

True’s Answer: Even ifyou were with Durhamat the time of the shooting, I’d venture to say you wouldn’t understand why hedid it. Durham is a troubled person;and, if still alive, dangerous to those he comes in contact with.

This situation with David Durham, and his disappearance intothin air, is extremely mysterious. Ihope one day we will get some answers – a fascinating case.

True Nelson

The Writer / a Short Story by True Nelson

2011-11-18T22:40:00.000-08:00

For those of you who might be interested, I've posted another short story on my sister blog, onlinetruestories.com/.

This is a more personalized account. I hope you enjoy reading it.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman Update / David Durham Connection? (Part 3)

2011-11-08T19:53:00.000-08:00

Well, I must say, first off, thank you for all your comments. And, there appears to be a resolution to my initial question, although agreed said resolution may not be that important. However, a reader on the East Coast made a copy of the blog thread to which some of you have referred. She has agreed to send it to me. Shortly after that publication, it was pulled as an unsubstantiated rumor.

As I have said previously, one of the emails I received was from an individual who claimed first hand knowledge. I would like to say to that individual that you need to come forward and furnish your information to law enforcement. I know you expressed concern about your own safety. I will admit that dirty cops do exist; but, thankfully, in Oregon they are a rarity. Contact a law enforcement agency that you trust. I might suggest the Oregon State Police. At one point, I would have suggested the FBI, but quite frankly I now feel they would dismiss you out of hand. If you want to send more detailed information to me, I will make sure that it goes to a proper person in a proper agency. If you have the doctor’s name, which you seem to indicate, that would tend to prove your credibility. Finally, if you’ve started a rumor just to see how far it would go, then shame on you.

For my other readers, it was not my intention to perpetuate a false rumor. I did make efforts to research the reported ‘hunting trip’ story prior to my blog posting. After that failed, I went to my next best source, my readers; many of whom follow these various cases more closely than I do.

I think we all have to admit that there are some strange correlations between Kyron Horman’s disappearance and the David Durham situation. Any reports, no matter how fanciful, are not easily dismissed. Practically anything is on the table at this point. As is said, sometimes life can be stranger than fiction.

Based on my experiences, I still find it incredible that David Durham was able to escape after shooting Dodds. To my mind, there are but two possibilities: Durham is dead somewhere and his body has not yet been found; or someone helped him to evade capture. I believe it is the second of the two.

True Nelson

David Anthony Durham

Unlawful Flight to Avoid Prosecution - Attempted Aggravated Murder (4 counts), Attempted Murder (10 counts), Assault in the First Degree, Assaulting a Public Safety Officer, Unlawful Use of a Weapon (12 counts), Recklessly Endangering Another (10 counts), Menacing (10 counts), Attempted Assault in the First Degree (9 counts), Assault in the Second Degree (3 counts), Attempted Assault on a Public Safety Officer (3 counts), Fleeing or Attempting to Elude a Police Officer (3 counts), Reckless Driving, Assault in the Third Degree.

	WMA; DOB: 3/11/68; 6'3"; 175#; blondish brown hair; blue eyes; scars, marks, tattoos - none known.

Remarks:

Durham is known to possess survival skills. He was wearing full green camouflage at the time of his disappearance, as well as tan or dark boots, and a dark-colored beret. In the past, he has expressed a desire to travel or is believed to have traveled to California, the Caribbean, and Thailand.

CAUTION

David Anthony Durham is wanted for his alleged involvement in the shooting of a police officer in Lincoln County, Oregon. At approximately 11:00 p.m. on January 23, 2011, the police officer pulled over an SUV for a traffic violation. During the traffic stop, the driver of the vehicle, later identified as Durham, shot the officer multiple times and critically wounded him. Durham then fled the area in the vehicle. A police chase ensued and Durham exchanged gunfire with officers before abandoning his vehicle in Waldport, Oregon.

A local arrest warrant was issued for Durham in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Lincoln on January 27, 2011, and he was charged with the various violations listed above. A federal arrest warrant was issued in the United States District Court in Portland, Oregon, on January 29, 2011, and Durham was charged with unlawful flight to avoid prosecution.

REWARD

The FBI is offering a reward of up to $10,000 for information leading to the location and arrest of David Anthony Durham.

SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ARMED AND DANGEROUS:

If you have any information concerning this person, please contact your local FBI office or the nearest American Embassy or Consulate.

FBI Field Office: Portland

Kyron Horman Update / David Durham Connection? (Part 2)

2011-11-07T21:27:00.000-08:00

David Durham

This is a response to Anonymous who left a rather caustic remark. I will not make it a practice to insult my readers, and I feel that readers leaving comments should exercise similar civility. Therefore, I will not publish your comment.

That said, perhaps my previous post requires some clarification.

The implication in the reports, that I received, was that David Durham had spoken to the unidentified ‘doctor’ after the shooting. Or, it is possible the doctor knew the circumstances described and drew the conclusion that Durham’s action in shooting the police officer was precipitated by his (Durham’s) fear of law enforcement.

Additionally, I don’t wish to perpetuate an inaccurate and unsubstantiated rumor. That is not my intention. My question was basically whether or not any of my readers knew the origin of the story set forth in my previous post. Sometimes rumors have an element of truth. Sometimes they are totally fabricated.

The David Durham situation is interesting to me in that the shooting of Officer Dodds appears, on the surface, to have no motive. This type of occurrence is something that all police officers contemplate and even fear, but such occurrences are fortunately rare. Most police officers, in making traffic stops, are concerned that they will happen upon someone who is wanted or fleeing a crime. In other words, the officer considers the stop routine; but the driver of the vehicle knows he is likely to be identified and arrested. This typical scenario does not fit Durham. He was not ‘wanted’ at the time of the shooting. He was not known to have a criminal record, or to be considered violent. He had no apparent reason to attempt to elude and to ultimately shoot Dodds. We could speculate that he had illegal drugs in the car, stolen property, or other evidence of a crime; but the automobile was recovered almost immediately and there was no indication of any of the above circumstances. Why would Durham do this? A psychotic episode? Perhaps. More importantly where is Durham now?

True Nelson

Kyron Horman Update / David Durham Connection?

2011-11-06T19:43:00.000-08:00

David Durham

Other than one rather interesting item, there is little to report in the Kyron Horman disappearance investigation. The investigation seems to be dragging, while Kyron’s parents continue to make efforts to sustain public interest in the case.

In the latter part of October, I received two emails from apparently different sources. One of the individuals reportedly had first hand knowledge of the following information. The other individual apparently had read something similar on the Internet. Perhaps some of you have information as to where this account / story originated.

The story has to do with a hunting trip during which one of the hunters, a doctor, related the following account to the others.

As a refresher, David Durham, a fugitive from justice, is responsible for shooting and nearly killing a police officer (Steven Dodds) on the Oregon Coast, near Waldport. Subsequent to the shooting Durham apparently vanished – in spite of a massive and quickly organized manhunt. His current whereabouts are unknown.

The story told by the ‘doctor’ (and I am receiving this information secondhand) alleges that Durham, a resident of Sauvie Island, observed Terri Horman and a police officer, known to Durham, loading a bundle into the back of a police car on Sauvie Island about the time of Kyron’s disappearance. The ‘doctor’ is supposedly a friend of Durham’s. He had learned from Durham that the reason he (Durham) shot Dodds was that he felt that he had been targeted for elimination by corrupt members of law enforcement.

Why the doctor, if he exists, has not come forward, I do not know. This account sounds a bit far-fetched I know, but I am interested in its origin.

There were additional details involving this story, but you get the general idea. Have some of you read or seen this report being circulated?

True Nelson

Doitchin Krastev, aka Jason Robert Evers / Should the OLCC be held responsible?

2011-11-04T18:42:00.000-07:00

A reader recently brought up a previous subject, Doitchin Krastev, who allegedly is serving time in prison, and will later be deported to his home country of Bulgaria. I doubt the deportation part of his sentence will ever materialize. The U.S. isn’t very good at that type of follow-up.

The reader stated: “I worked for a distillery in Bend, Oregon that he frequently harassed. This man is a liar and he cost a lot of people thousands and thousands of dollars due to his false accusations. We complained so much that the OLCC moved him to another county. This was short-lived because they moved him back after a short time. Several bar owners in Bend sued due to his harassment.”

True's Comment: Krastev was, of course, a Bulgarian – in the country illegally – using the name of a murdered child, Jason Robert Evers. Additionally, he was able to obtain, under false pretenses, an enforcement position within the Oregon Liquor Control Commission. A circumstance that the OLCC has made no real attempt to explain.

The reader went on to ask: “Due to his lack of identity, and therefore authority, shouldn't all of his fines and tickets that he wrote become null and void?”

True’s Answer: An interesting question, but it is doubtful that the establishments penalized by Krastev would be able to reverse those fines. Furthermore, a legal attempt to do so might prove more expensive than it’s worth – at least on an individual basis.

However, if there are a number of like-minded establishments with similar Krastev harassment issues – as you’ve described – you might be able to file a class action suit against the OLCC. Clearly the OLCC did not exercise due diligence in its hiring practice. If that legal position could be established, the OLCC may have to void those cases, and make whole any establishments penalized under Krastev’s watch.

True Nelson

A Discussion of 'Irony,' related to Ali Soufan's recent book: The Black Banners...

2011-10-24T21:22:00.000-07:00

Ali Soufan

In rereading my previous post regarding Ali Soufan’s recent non-fiction book, something jumped out at me. It bothers me a bit. I’m not sure how others feel about this.

A paraphrased comment within Soufan’s book was as follows: “a reporter once asked the Director of the FBI (Robert Mueller) about the future of the FBI, and he allegedly pointed to Soufan.”

When I did my initial post, the irony of the above statement simply passed me by. As we know, irony, ironic, ironically has to do with stark incongruity, inconsistency, or even folly. Perhaps, this is one of those times when I’m making a mountain out of a molehill; but doesn’t it seem odd, even ironic, that the “future of the FBI” is personified by an Arab American, born in Jordan, who is presumably a Muslim? And that said statement is attributable to the current Director of the FBI. This is not a personal rap at Mr. Soufan, who I’m sure was an excellent Agent and served his country (the United States) well. However, Soufan’s principal attributes as an Agent were his comprehensive understanding of Middle Eastern culture, the Koran, and the related languages. Important? Yes, very much so. But, is he the ‘future’ of the FBI? If so, what is the future of the FBI?

For the sake of discussion, what if Hoover, during World War II, suggested that a Japanese American Special Agent was the future of the FBI? As we know, almost all Japanese Americans were loyal to the United States. Many fought as American soldiers in Europe with great courage.

I know our present-day population is more diversified, and more tolerant. But does Mueller’s, apparently casual statement, bother any one else? If not, why not?

True Nelson

Ali Soufan's book - The Black Banners; The Inside Story of 9/11 and the War Against al-Qaeda.

2011-10-21T21:30:00.000-07:00

Just finished a book titled, The Black Banners; The Inside Story of 9/11 and the War Against al-Qaeda. The author is Ali H. Soufan, a former FBI Special Agent and an Arab-American, born in Lebanon. Do I recommend the book? Well, I’m not sure. It would undoubtedly be interesting to some, and probably interesting to a lot of Americans who have closely followed the actions and intrigue in the Middle East. But, the book is packed with mechanical detail; and many actors' muslin names and aliases, which are, incidentally, difficult to keep track of. However, Soufan furnishes a list of the ‘principal characters’ at the back of the book in case (likely) the reader becomes confused over who did what to whom and when.

Mr. Soufan had a storied career in the Bureau – the right man at the right place at the right time. Anecdotally, a reporter once asked the Director of the FBI (Robert Mueller) about the future of the FBI, and he allegedly pointed to Soufan. Mr. Soufan has now resigned from the Bureau and works for the New York security agency headed by Rudy Giuliani.

Soufan’s book has been carefully reviewed by both the FBI and the CIA. Parts of the current edition have considerable redaction – lines or words simply blacked-out.

I was impressed with Soufan’s knowledge and recall. It’s my belief that he could not have written this book without considerable access to classified documents, both while an Agent and subsequently. His detailed recall of names, places, times, and situations defy normal memory. There has to be a hidden agenda in his story that seems to reflect the unacknowledged compliance from the FBI, and perhaps others in government. Why would the Bureau cooperate in this literary endeavor? Perhaps, it was in the best interest of the Bureau to publicly air the presented information. The referenced book certainly reflects favorably on the Bureau. And, not so favorably on the CIA. In the old days, Hoover ‘wrote’ a couple of books, including Masters of Deceit. Although, after Hoover's death, it was commonly understood that the books were actually written by FBI Agents – on behalf of the Director. It makes sense. The Director of the FBI would not have time to sit down and write a book or books.

Currently, the FBI is far more sophisticated. Director Mueller is not going to attempt to pen a book in his spare time that appears, in any way, defensive. However, I can imagine the Bureau, in cooperation with a particular Former Agent, would be willing to offer its considerable resources – to relate their side of the story.

It is telling that Soufan reveals in his commentary that the redacted portions of his book were at the sole direction of the CIA; and that the FBI didn’t seem to find any problem with the revelations in the book.

Soufan does point-out that ‘enhanced interrogation’ or torture has not proven to be very successful. I tend to agree. Torture gets results, but not necessarily good results. Humanistic interrogation over extended periods has been proven to obtain the best results. When adequate time is available that is. If time is very limited, the jury is out.

True Nelson

Proposed Blog on Short Stories / Crime, Investigations, Mystery / Comments Welcome

2011-10-17T10:43:00.000-07:00

Some of my observations, learning experiences, on writing a blog probably come as no surprise to most of you.

There is no doubt that everyone has there own opinions about a wide range of topics, and when perusing blogs they tend to gravitate toward blog authors who share most of those opinions, or at least the principal ones.

The Kyron Horman investigation is a good example. The responses I received from readers were generally from two camps – those that agreed with or supported my views, and those that believed I didn’t know my ass from first base – and clearly didn’t plan to be stopping back any time soon.

Writing a blog can be fun. I enjoy the interaction with different people, and the exchange of ideas. I realize that a successful blog has to be somewhat edgy. Nonetheless, I do not enjoy making people angry. That is not my nature. There were times when I’ve wondered, ‘Why in the heck are you even doing this’? And, I never did arrive at a truly satisfactory answer to that question.

The other consideration is the monetary cost – is it worth it? I thought about running ads, as many do. But, I’ve never done that for two reasons; one reason is I don’t believe those ads derive much return; and two they seem almost embarrassingly mercenary. Furthermore, I never felt that I could write an opinion piece, on a consistent basis, which was so interesting readers would still put up with non-relevant advertisements.

So, what’s all this about? Well, I plan to continue with this blog with its opportunity to answer questions and comments on current events. However, I additionally plan to start a second blog that I’m hoping some of you will enjoy – and will even participate.

The new blog is to be titled TRUE Stories by True Nelson. It will have a law enforcement, investigations’ theme; and will focus on an endeavor that I much enjoy – writing. I’ve written a number of short stories, a couple of which have been published. However, as would-be writers soon discover getting a short story published is hardly worth the bother. It takes considerable effort and the eventual remuneration is usually in the area of a few hundred dollars. Quite frankly, there is little market for short stories, unless you are a well known author – aka novelist. I plan to exhibit some of my own writing on this blog; and I hope readers will find that interesting, entertaining, and willing to return for more.

Additionally, I would like other authors to submit theme related stories they’ve written to be featured on my blog. I’m not in a position to pay for stories, essays, or other literary or artistic efforts, but it could garner you some potentially worldwide exposure; and you retain the copyright. I do know that producers of potential television and motion picture projects occasionally peruse these sites looking for ideas, story lines, and quality writers. It may be a way of being discovered.

I know some of you might have wonderful stories in mind, or already written. I am looking for stories (fiction or nonfiction) in keeping with the blog’s theme of ‘Crime, Investigations, and Mystery.’

For any of you who might have comments on this proposed project, please do.

I’m still coordinating some final work on the described blog. I hope to have it up and running by the end of the month or the first part of November. I will keep you posted.

True Nelson

Law enforcement culture / The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly

2011-10-13T10:41:00.000-07:00

For the sake of meaningful discourse, I’d like to address a recent comment from one of my readers. (Re: My previous posts regarding the trials and tribulations of billionaire Paul Allen.)

Reader said: I do not believe that members of law enforcement past or present, retired or active, are necessarily a group with higher moral standards than the average person. Just like many average people, they have sex, both licit and illicit. They snort cocaine, smoke marijuana, gulp vicodin and booze just like the rest of the population.

And, just like everyone else who works for a super rich person, security personnel are owned by that super rich person. For the super rich, it is not merely "a concept of entitlement" as you say, it IS entitlement.

If these ex-Allen security people were so upset about him and his entourage participating in illegal activities, then why not turn them over to the law? I think the answer is their settlement wouldn't amount to much. They'd get their 15 minutes of fame and that's about it. A nice fat settlement must appear more important to these "ethics" police than justice.

True’s Response: Well reader, although your comment is somewhat of a downer, you are probably right. And, as a result, you’ve tramped a bit on my idealistic side. Yes, you are probably right. Proportionately speaking, modern law enforcement personnel likely have just as many problems as the general public – maybe even more. I wish it wasn’t so.

Regarding Allen's civil suit, yes, money is the principal motivator.

Regarding the moral, ethical standards of law enforcement types (past and present), well...

In recent times the FBI has had, among their Special Agents, subsequently convicted murderers, embezzlers, and international spies. The reasons for that go far beyond coincidence. It has become symptomatic and representative of the times and culture in which we live. Local law enforcement is just as bad, perhaps even worse.

Some of my personal observations:

Qualifications for employment: When I entered the Bureau, the standard regarding the use of illegal drugs was unequivocal. If you’d ever used illegal drugs, you were simply not Agent material. Currently, the standard for an Agent position is that you can’t have used illegal drugs in the last three to five years. Additionally, in those days you were not accepted if you were found to have cohabited with a female out of wedlock. Any whiff of scandal, dishonesty, unethical behavior found in your very thorough background investigation automatically eliminated you from consideration.

I’ve heard that modern Agents are smarter than those in the 70s. OK, but if they are, it doesn’t seem to be reflected in the results for which they are paid exceedingly well – referencing results for per capita fines, savings, recoveries and prosecutions. Go to the FBI website and review their posted accomplishments. For an agency, a bureaucracy, the size of the present FBI, they aren’t that impressive.

Modern Agents would find the earlier referenced standards for employment, to become an Agent, quaint, petty and laughable. And, maybe they were. Times do change, but changes often parallel the erosion of standards.

Unionization of our emergency services: Probably the worst thing that ever happened to the quality of law enforcement. Suddenly, the chief administrator of a law enforcement agency has no real control over managing the conduct and effectiveness of his employees. Law enforcement personnel should serve ‘at will.’ They should be salaried ‘exempt’ personnel. If you don’t know the difference between ‘exempt’ and ‘non-exempt’ look it up. Furthermore, the chief administrator is beholden to the union to get him elected and/or preserve his position – tit for tat. I know this comment will undoubtedly generate a few ugly remarks. I’m sorry, but it’s the truth.

Affirmative Action: A good idea when it started, a great idea when it started, but it quickly evolved into a quota system. Standards of employment were adjusted downward to meet Affirmative Action expectations. Some of you will huff and puff, but it’s true.

Did you know that the mental test you take for employment as a FBI Agent, and/or scoring, varies according to race, sex, etc.?

Let me give you one small example regarding firearms training for FBI Agents. When I became an Agent, we had a rather challenging firearms course in which to qualify – shooting, with a handgun, initially from the sixty yard line and then moving forward to other positions while reloading - all timed. In the recent past, some, a few, not all, of female applicants have had trouble with the firearms' requirements. So, the standards were gradually reduced. Now the Bureau is considering reducing the shooting requirement to seven yards. No, that’s not a joke. Why? The official reason is that gunfights are generally within the seven yard distance. I say, nonsense. The real reason? Affirmative action. Allegedly some women and a few men have ‘small hands’ which reportedly creates an unfair disadvantage for them. I’m sorry, but if you have such small hands that it makes you unable to effectively utilize the Bureau’s issue weapon, maybe you should not be a FBI Agent. And, if the Agent trainee is unable to learn proper marksmanship (trigger control, sight alignment and gun management), perhaps they shouldn’t carry a gun at all. They constitute a danger to themselves and the public.

PS: For those of you who are non-shooters, a good, earlier qualified FBI Agent – from seven yards – could hit the K-5 on a silhouette, six for six, blindfolded.

True Nelson

Sex and Illegal Drugs in the Corporate World and Among the Super Rich

2011-10-11T12:45:00.000-07:00

Re: My posting of 10/6/11:

This is a follow-up to my previous comments concerning Billionaire Paul Allen. However, my current comments are not intended to infer any direct relevance to Paul Allen – either his personal life or his business practices. I have no knowledge of Allen’s, or his colleagues’, ethics or life style, other than what have been publicly revealed. No, this is related to a comment by one of my readers that happens to interest me.

Reader’s Comment: You throw on the table what are either acts of illicit sex or illegal drugs? Sex and use of drugs are not all that uncommon in the corporate world today, sorry to say.

True’s Response: First, my initial comments were speculation, a guess, based on the civil suit’s premise.

However, regarding sex and illegal drugs in the corporate world, or among the rich and powerful for that matter, I do have some thoughts and observations.

As security expertise pertains to the workplace, there are many specialties. A few of which are as follows: Corporate Security; Executive Protection (body guards); Technology / Computer Protection / Alarms / Perimeter Security; Accounting and Forensic Accounting; Security Guards; etc.

I was in Corporate Security with a major international corporation (publicly held) with a Board of Directors, a CEO, numerous Senior VPs, Directors, and Executives who all operated under the legal strictures of a publicly held (share holders’ based) company. Was there sex and illegal drug problems? Yes, but they were never condoned and/or financed by the company. In fact, they were investigated and treated very seriously to include termination and often prosecution. A company, particularly a major corporation, faces a considerable downside when it comes to employee misconduct. Massive civil suits, federal intervention, and harm to brand name are always concerns. Corporate Security does get involved in Executive Protection matters – at times. However, it is usually rather formal; and has little resemblance to being a ‘body guard.’

In contrast, let’s discuss ‘body guard’ work – such as what you might expect when employed by someone like Paul Allen, or say Paul McCartney (Ex-Beatle in the news and recently married). I’ve never been involved in actual ‘body guard’ work, but I’ve spoken with several who were.

The Pauls are among the super rich; and when you go to work for someone like that you should expect to leave some of your personal ethics or morals at the door. Not only that, but the work can often be somewhat demeaning.

For example, I once talked with a former body guard who worked for a rock band. He was a former cop, and had just about seen everything in his former career. But, he too was shocked at what he was expected to do. His duties included being awakened and expected to run to a burger joint at 3:00AM to pick up food, looking the other way when some of the band members were indulging in their favorite pastimes to include illegal drugs and indiscriminate sex with some very young looking women / girls. As well as being called upon to meet, greet, sweet talk and procure young women to meet ‘the boys.’ That said, there are some obvious benefits – if you’re so inclined. Some women would do almost anything to meet ‘the boys;’ and, of course, there were always the female hand-me-downs. Such duties would strain the ethics of most of us, because it is a life which few of us have experienced. One could almost say that the Mafia has more easily definable ethical standards - albeit dubious. Anyway, the former cop told me that he lasted less than a year. He just couldn’t do it.

I suppose my final comment, regarding Paul Allen (and I don’t know the circumstances of the civil suit against him), is that I would expect the worst when taking a job with a super rich individual. That’s not to say they are all as described above. But, when you are as rich as Paul Allen or Paul McCartney many social mores, commonly observed by the general public, seem irrelevant to them.

There is a saying in the military, ‘rank has its privileges (RHIP).’ For the super rich, this is a concept of entitlement embraced by many; a mindset that goes well beyond the immediate right to buy whatever strikes their fancy.

True Nelson

Billionaire Imbroglio / Paul Allen vs Vulcan Security Staff (his personal bodyguards)

2011-10-06T16:38:00.000-07:00

Billionaire Paul Allen, co-founder of Microsoft, and owner of sports’ franchises – the Portland Trail Blazers and the Seattle Seahawks – is currently involved in an interesting civil suit brought against him by his Security Staff. His Security Director and other staff members have alleged that they could no longer work for Allen due to activities by Allen and some of his executives; acts that security personnel considered “unethical and illegal.” What might that be?

Those named as defendants include Paul Allen, his company Vulcan Inc. (founded in 1986), and other executives.

The plaintiffs in the case are four former employees, all security personnel, who quit or were forced out due to their observations of, and failure to condone, ‘acts which they considered to be unethical and illegal on the part of Vulcan corporate executives.’ Among the Plaintiffs was Kathy Leodler, who spent more than 20 years as a Special Agent with the FBI.

This is a case in which the public will probably never know the detailed allegations, or the final settlement. Paul Allen is just too rich; and too well represented. If the claims have basis, he will settle out of court for a large sum of money with the stipulation that the plaintiffs back off, and the file remains sealed.

So what could be the nature of the unethical or illegal acts allegedly involving Allen and high-ranking executives?

I think, for starters, we can state that the wrongful acts were not major felonies. Why? The Security Staff would not normally be privy to this type of conspiratorial intrigue. It would not be consistent with their job description. Furthermore, Leodler is certainly aware of Misprision of a Felony. (Hiding a crime – the failure of someone who knows of, but is not involved in, a felony or treason to report it to the authorities). In that regard, there have been no reports of a parallel criminal investigation having been initiated – thus far.

No, I believe that the Security staff witnessed either acts of illicit sex and/or illegal drugs. This is speculation, of course. How can Allen counter such speculation? By having an open hearing on the allegations – which I firmly believe he will not do.

True Nelson

Mean Justice / An Interesting Book by Edward Humes (Part 2)

2011-10-01T12:03:00.000-07:00

Re: My previous post (9/30/11) on the book Mean Justice.

To the reader who sent me the recent comment, thank you. Your comment is well said, and the basis for a good discussion. It is the type of comment that always draws me back to my computer when, perhaps, I should be doing other things.

Reader said: "For attorneys, particularly trial lawyers, it is all about winning." You certainly have an issue with that, don't you! That last I heard, anyone charged with a crime in this country are entitled to a fair trial. When a lawyer is hired to defend someone in a criminal case that is exactly what they are expected to do and have to do. They can think their client is the scum of the earth but when they take their case - even if appointed by the Court to defend that person - they have to defend them to the best of their ability. I have a lawyer friend who is one the best in defending his clients in court. However, he is very selective of the clients he takes on to defend. A person walks into his office who is charged with or suspected of possible child abuse in any manner he won't even give them a minute of his time to sit down to discuss their version whether guilty or innocent.

True’s response: Yes, indeed, it is all about winning! That is my point exactly. Our system of justice is one of the best in the world, but it is not without faults. The presupposition on which that system is based is that: two equally prepared and erudite attorneys will face-off in a courtroom under what might be considered strictly enforced Marques of Queensberry Rules. The result, or should I say the hoped for result, is justice. But, for attorneys, both defense and prosecution, justice is often synonymous with winning. Does that mean that attorneys can’t be nice people? Of course they can.

My earlier comparison of the courtroom with a sporting event like baseball or football is not completely accurate. In the courtroom the competitors are evaluated by a panel of 12 unprepared, unsophisticated, and in many instances uneducated individuals who know little or nothing about the judicial system. A football or baseball game has a well defined outcome, and a fairness that far exceeds the courtroom. Somewhat surprisingly justice does often / usually prevail in the courtroom, but not always. Jurors can be and are manipulated by attorneys based on the attorney’s reputation, eloquence, command of details, or even their appearance. And that’s not to mention a juror’s preconceived notions and biases.

Regarding attorney ethics: Have you ever heard an attorney, either defense or prosecution, who – subsequent to a decision – said, ‘Hey, I’m sorry, but the jury got this one wrong?’ ‘I honestly believe the person is actually guilty (from the defense side); or I honestly believe the person is innocent (from the prosecution side).’ You will never hear that because they would be promptly disbarred and/or fired.

If you are an attorney, you need to check your conscience and ethical standards at the courtroom door – or find other employment. Winning is everything.

Reader said: We both know there are clients who lie to their lawyers and sometimes lawyers actually don't catch on. However, an ethical lawyer will NOT permit his client to get on the stand and lie! Now if that lawyer defends that client to the best of his ability, without the client testifying, and wins the case then shame on the prosecution for not having their case iron-clad! The arrogance and/or sloppy investigation of many a prosecutor has cost them the loss of a case and a guilty person has walked free!

True’s Response: Yes, you are entirely correct. Good lawyers will not let their client get on the stand and lie. And, defendants are not required to take their chances on the stand – even if they plan to tell the truth. Good prosecutors could destroy Mother Teresa. Question: Even though they could, would those efforts be ethical?

And, as I understand your point, if the prosecution comes to court ‘not having their case ironclad,’ then it is justifiable for a guilty person to walk. Is this ethical on the part of a defense attorney to take advantage of an improperly prepared prosecutor, and let a murderer or rapist go free?

Reader said: I would think, True, that if you or any member of your family should ever need a defense lawyer you would expect and want nothing but the best out of that lawyer in defending the whoever!

True’s Response: Yes, you are right; I would want a good attorney. But, I would hope that if I was the one on trial, and I knew I was guilty, that I would stand and take my punishment. If the person on trial was a close relative, and I knew them to be guilty, I would tell them the same thing. You only live once. This is your moment to stand and deliver.

One other thing, you mentioned that your attorney friend never took cases involving ‘child abuse.’ When you read Mean Justice, you will probably have a new perspective.

True Nelson

Mean Justice / An Interesting Book by Edward Humes

2011-09-30T22:13:00.000-07:00

On the recommendation of a reader, I just finished a book by Edward Humes. The title of the book is Mean Justice (“A Town’s Terror, A Prosecutor’s Power, A Betrayal of Innocence).

I’m not going to attempt a literary ‘review,’ there are many others who can do that sort of thing much better. But I do have some comments that you might find of interest.

Edward Humes is a prominent writer and a winner of the Pulitzer Prize. In this particular book, he selected as a focus subject, a convicted murderer (Pat Dunn). Dunn was convicted in 1993 for the murder of his wife, Alexandra. I suppose the overshadowing premise of the book is the belief that Pat Dunn was wrongfully convicted due to malfeasance on the part of Kern County (Bakersfield, California) law enforcement, and particularly the District Attorney’s Office led by Ed Jagels. To add spice to a rather formulaic murder case, Humes brings in many other, and unrelated, instances of withholding evidence, unethical practices, and frankly criminal conduct on the part of the police and prosecutors. If true, the allegations are shocking and unconscionable.

Humes began to research the Dunn case at the prompting of private investigator, Laura Lawhon an investigator retained by the defense attorney representing Pat Dunn. Lawhon approaches Humes, relates her beliefs regarding the case and Dunn’s innocence; and offers Humes volumes of interviews and other evidence that she has acquired. Humes is obviously intrigued to the point that he begins and finishes the above stated book (copyrighted 1999).

For those contemplating becoming, or are currently, private investigators involved in criminal defense, I recommend the book. It gives you many insights regarding the difficulties, frustrations, and occasional danger faced by PI criminal defense investigators.

Lawhon comes off as a compassionate, dedicated investigator; but somewhat naïve, in my opinion. Her principal attributes as an investigator are apparently an agile mind and a disarming smile. She admits to becoming so personally involved in some of her cases that she continues to correspond with convicted clients in prison – even, at times, furnishing them money for various reasons (money which she apparently acquired due to an inheritance).

The best investigators, both in criminal defense and in law enforcement, are pragmatic, professional, experienced, ethical, honest, and generally do not become personally involved.

Regarding the fairness, or lack thereof, of Dunn’s trial, there is plenty of fault to go around. If Pat Dunn did not receive a fair trial, fault may lie with his lack of a proper defense, a skilled but allegedly unscrupulous prosecution, a jury unable to comprehend significant aspects of the evidence presented by the defense and the prosecution and/or a judge who ineptly managed the entire process.

As a writer, Humes keeps the reader in a state of expectation. Unfortunately, those expectations are never realized, and were perhaps unrealistic to start with. Dunn is convicted by a unanimous jury. Although troubling doubts remain in her mind, Lawhon has discovered that jury decisions are hard to overturn during an appeal. Nonetheless, the ‘real killer’ is never identified, and Dunn remains incarcerated.

I guess my grinding frustration with Humes' book is his constant referral to all the ‘innocent’ people that have been sentenced to long prison terms and even given the death penalty. He cites many examples of innocent people being ultimately set free when new evidence is presented. Many of those people cited were released not because they were ‘innocent,’ but because their case was deemed no longer viably prosecutable. Am I splitting hairs? No, I don’t believe I am.

For example, a defendant claims that he was in the backyard smoking a joint and totally stoned, when a girl he had picked-up at a bar was raped and murdered in his bedroom. He is convicted and sentenced to life in prison. Years later it is determined that the semen specimen (DNA) found in the girl’s vagina did not match the defendants. A new trial is ordered; but many witnesses are now unavailable and the evidence collected has degraded to the point that much of it would be inadmissible. A new trial is deemed not feasible. Would you consider him ‘innocent?’ I would consider him ‘not guilty’ or not prosecutable under our system of criminal justice, but ‘innocent?’ I don’t think so. Hume seems incapable or unwilling to acknowledge the difference between innocence and ‘walking’ for lack of, or improperly presented, evidence.

The public generally holds attorneys in low esteem. There is a reason for that. And, I have personally observed the reason first hand. For attorneys, particularly trial lawyers, it is all about winning. I’ve often wondered if law schools teach ethics; and, if they do, the nature of that instruction. The practice of law among attorneys, in my opinion, closely parallels a sporting event like baseball or football. If you are not flagged by the judge during a trial, your cleverness in putting one over, is praised by your colleagues – regardless of who is hurt in the process.

Private Investigators, in Oregon, are required to have a certain number of instructional hours each year on the topic of ethics. It always amuses me that the instructors, invariably, are attorneys. That is one of the last occupational groups that I would select to lead a discussion on ethics.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman Revisited / Some Bizarre Developments

2011-09-25T12:41:00.000-07:00

It is my intention to revisit the Kyron Horman disappearance / investigation approximately once a month – to highlight potential developments.

At the risk of immediately losing some readers, it is clear that there are no significant investigative breakthroughs. However, there are some interesting, even bizarre, developments. Moreover, I’d like to clarify some of my own comments regarding this case.

Searches of areas (Northwest Germantown and Newberry roads, as well as the Northwest Skyline district) have recently been conducted – reportedly with no success. Further searches are planned. Exactly why these searches were not conducted a year ago is not clear. For those who are not familiar with the Portland Metro region, the stated areas are relatively close-in, while still maintaining a somewhat rural, sometimes wild and difficult to access nature.

Kaine Horman, Kyron’s father, has acquired a purple quarter-inch Mohawk as a tribute to his son. Apparently, this is something Kyron wanted to do.

Clarification of some of my past statements:

The actual wording of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution states that a person shall not be “compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” Court decisions have subsequently ruled that this protection is also available in certain civil cases, wherein defendants are facing criminal charges.

Secondly, I received a lot of blow-back over my oft referenced comment that Terri Horman should be charged with Capital Murder, based on ‘what we know.’ This was a comment that should have been considered a shot from the hip in response to a reader’s question. It was based on my frustration with the lack of progress in this case, and my concern for the whereabouts of Kyron. At that particular juncture, I couldn’t have cared less if Terri was acquitted if there was a outside possibility that the trial and testimony under oath could assist in locating Kyron. That was, no doubt, not a professional opinion – more a human one.

If, worst case scenario, Terri was subjected to a criminal trial and acquitted – well, they tried. At that point a civil trial could commence, and there is a strong likelihood that she would be held civilly responsible for Kyron’s disappearance, with resulting monetary penalties, and loss of custody rights involving her daughter. Is this enough? No, but I’d rather that than allowing this case to become a cold case that drags on into the uncharted future.

Option: Stay the course and trust the authorities. A bitter pill, I must say.

True Nelson

David and Judith Tebbutt / Kenya Kidnapping / Some Additional Comments

2011-09-18T20:35:00.000-07:00

A reader’s comment prompted me to respond to a question, and expand on my previous post regarding David and Judith Tebbutt. (Re: My post of 9/17/11)

As a preface and update, an Islamist group, Ras Kaambooni, has claimed responsibility for the kidnapping of Judith Tebbutt. Furthermore, a handyman at the resort has admitted leading the kidnappers to their target. The handyman claims that he was coerced by the kidnappers to cooperate. Whether or not that is true has not been determined.

Reader asked: Is it really the countries’ responsibility to protect people from their own stupidity? Further, do we really want our countries to have the absolute Right to tell us where we can travel to or not?

True’s Answer: No, generally speaking, I don’t think it is a country’s responsibility to protect people from their own stupidity. But that opinion, although I might personally feel that way at times, only goes so far. Unfortunately, people who put themselves in dangerous situations that turn bad invariably expect that others will rescue them. And, I suppose one could say it is the decent thing to do, the human thing to do, to make those efforts. Nonetheless, I believe others often risk their own lives to affect those rescues. Governments are expected to expend considerable resources. Reasonable, I’m not sure. Required, probably.

Regarding the Tebbutts, I do not personally fault them. I don’t know all the circumstances. But, it is obvious that their decision to vacation in Kenya, at that particular location, was ill-conceived. From what I’ve read, Judith had reservations about going there. It sounds as if this trip was at the instigation of David, her husband. If that is correct, he has paid a dreadful price for his decision.

This may sound chauvinistic, perhaps even frivolous to some, but I think it is part of a man’s nature to protect and rescue females. Dare I say an evolutionary imperative? Literature is filled with this theme – the damsel in distress – the rescue against all odds. Oh, yes, I can now hear the feminists out there groaning in disgust and disbelief.

As I’ve mentioned in some of my previous posts, I was a FBI Agent in San Francisco during the Patty Hearst case. In my youthful exuberance, or maybe because of genetic disposition, I would have willingly ran through a hail of bullets to attempt her rescue. After she publicly condemned us (the FBI) in a very hateful way, I would have had second thoughts – but… done it anyway.

Is Judith the quintessential ‘damsel in distress,’ or is she an equal participant in a very bad decision? I do not know.

True Nelson

David and Judith Tebbutt / Kenya Kidnapping / Traveler's Responsibilitiy

2011-09-17T21:29:00.000-07:00

I’m not an expert in security issues involving the Horn of Africa, including Somalia, Kenya, Djibouti, and other countries of the region, but I’d like to discuss some very basic questions with my readers.

TRAGIC: Recently Judith Tebbutt, wife of British executive David Tebbutt, was kidnapped from a ‘luxury’ resort in Kenya – located on the coast and less than twenty miles from the Somalia border. The Tebbutts were the only vacationers at the resort. I wonder why? David was apparently shot and killed when he resisted. Judith’s whereabouts are currently unknown, but she is believed to be in Somalia.

This is, of course, not the first kidnapping of Westerners in the region. Nor, undoubtedly, will it be the last. It is apparently an incredibly lucrative crime. If you search out information on the numerous regional kidnappings, not to mention the hijacking of ships, you will see that the ransom demands and the payoffs are in the millions of dollars. Captives can expect the following from their captors: they will be exchanged for prisoners held by Western governments, their freedom will be purchased for a multi-million dollar ransom which is often / usually paid by a government agency, or they will be killed.

What’s bewildering to me is that the government agencies do their best, go to great efforts, to conceal the amount of ransom paid. Why is that? Certainly, the kidnappers know the amount. I suppose it has to do with the government not wanting the more criminally-challenged kidnappers in the world to know what they are missing. However, if you have access to the Internet, and are willing to delve into it, there are always witnesses and family members that ultimately spill the beans.

My question is couldn’t David and Judith have found somewhere else to spend an extravagant vacation? Am I heartless to say this?

And, why do the U.S. or British governments, as well as other Western governments give their citizens the right to go to these dangerous regions of the world – without taking out a massive insurance policy to cover the ransom demands? Most major corporations do this for their executives. Perhaps, David’s company carried this coverage. Although, that sort of insurance policy is generally for business related travel, not vacations.

Then again, I suppose the same questions could be put forth about one of our neighbors, Mexico. Although, said country has not yet reached the entrepreneurial capacity for kidnappings of say Somalia. It will. You can count on that.

Does the individual traveler have any personal responsibilities? Or is ignorance of the dangers a valid defense? Should our military be used to attempt a rescue? Should our government pay the ransom?

Have you ever read the U.S State Department’s travel warnings for a particular country? They are quite often extensive, and usually somewhat comical.

Regarding Mexico, it reads something like – if I might paraphrase – there have been tens of thousands murders in the last few years in Mexico involving the drug trade and the government’s efforts to stifle the illegal narcotics’ business (often without much success). Many of the murders, although we do not keep those statistics, involved innocent bystanders. Usually American citizens are not targeted, but it could happen. We highly recommend that you stay out of dark alleys, dubious neighborhoods, and the following numerous cities and provinces. Additionally, we recommend you be alert to potential danger wherever and whenever it might occur; even though we are aware that you would be helpless to protect yourself. Have fun and enjoy your vacation. Odds are that you will return home safely.

True Nelson

The Psychopath in Law Enforcement

2011-09-13T14:29:00.000-07:00

Anonymous good question – and deserving of an answer.

Re: The Psychopath Test (posting of 9/10/11)

Reader’s Question: Anyway, to your point of the psychopath and/or sociopath potentially lurking within our corporate executives and politicians, would this not also include members of our ‘justice’ system?

True’s Answer: Absolutely. I would say that the percentage of psychopaths in law enforcement, and the justice system in general, is twice the percentage of psychopaths in the general public, or roughly 2%.

For the psychopath, law enforcement and the perceived dominance of others would be an attractive professional option to the psychopathic personality.

Some of this 'hiring boards' attempt to prevent through the interview process and psychological testing. And, sometimes they succeed, but not always. I still believe that the 2% figure is a good approximation.

Now, if you'd like to discuss some foreign police agencies, like Mexico, that percentage would be much higher.

True Nelson

Doitchin Krastev, aka Doitchin Krasev, aka Jason Robert Evers / Story Untold? / Officially Hidden?

2011-09-12T10:54:00.000-07:00

Anonymous, you hit a nerve with your question and comments regarding Doitchin Krastev, aka Jason Robert Evers. (Re: My posting of 1/31/11.) This was one of the more interesting cases that I’ve discussed on my blog. Many glaring questions remain unanswered. You have some valid insights regarding Krastev.

I will paraphrase your question / comments:

Anonymous said (September 11, 2011 4:23 PM )

‘Where and how did Doitchin learn how to steal someone’s identity? This particular way is a spy method. Doitchin was a young boy; the Internet was not commercially available yet. It is not like he googled that. So, what kind of spy training did he receive and at what age? Who was handing him over money? He did buy his position in Colorado (if you read all the information about this case). His family was not intellectuals. This was the so called nomenklatura; communists, privileged people, and his grandfather was the boss of the Bulgarian Military Intelligence. Doitchin was born in Moscow and that makes him a Russian citizen by place of birth. I can go on and on... I think that he should be questioned by counter-espionage people. This is a far bigger case then it is made to look!’

Anonymous, some of my thoughts from my earlier posting:

§ Krastev came to the US between 1990 and 1992. He was sponsored by Michael Horowitz, a high official in the Reagan administration. When he disappeared, as reported, Horowitz hired a PI to track Krastev – with negative results. Horowitz did not notify the State Department, Customs and Immigration, or the FBI. This tells me that Horowitz was uncomfortable with what had occurred and the potential political and career implications for him. Horowitz is an attorney, and well aware of his legal responsibilities.

§ Krastev went on to assume the identity of the murdered child, Jason Evers. An act which was blatantly facilitated by the State of Ohio. It is common practice for those attempting to secure a new identity to use a deceased person’s name and DOB. Although, in many states this is difficult to do.

§ The Oregon Liquor Control Commission, an archaic system somewhat unique to Oregon, hired Krastev – totally unaware of who he really was. The OLCC is a government agency, and as a result Krastev was given access to very confidential information and databases.

§ The failure of our Federal government in locating, or even being aware that Krastev was loose in our country for such a long time, is symptomatic of a myriad of governmental problems. I suppose we all recall the Russian Ten, and how quickly that matter evaporated – no prosecutions, and they were returned home to a virtual hero’s welcome.

§ Also, we should be aware of the fact that Bulgaria (previously a communist country) is currently an ally of the US – and, more or less symbolically, supporting our efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

§ Krastev came from a prominent Bulgarian family (influentially and monetarily). He had no reason to forsake his family, all his contacts both in Bulgaria and the US, and his educational background, simply to scratch-out a basic existence in the US.

§ When first arrested, he refused to identify himself to authorities, stating that he was fearful for his life. This could mean that he feared he would be charged with espionage – a reasonable expectation – especially if that could be substantiated through the now friendly Bulgarian Intelligence Service. That he may have drifted away from his original assignment or objective, I don’t know. However, I have little doubt about his original purpose.

Anonymous, in support of your statement, you are exactly right – “this is a far bigger case than it is made to look.”

I have sometimes wondered why an investigative journalist has not attacked this subject. It is very symptomatic of the United States’ loose controls regarding foreign nationals. And, it would be an interesting story to tell. That said, it is clear that our government would rather bury it.

It’s been a long time since I heard that word, ‘nomenklatura.’ Krastev’s parents were undoubtedly ‘intellectuals’ and academics, but they were also undoubtedly members of the nomenklatura within the Soviet Union and the Eastern Block countries.

I believe that Krastev’s initial plan (and his early development) was to become a hidden operative (a ‘sleeper’) within the U.S. I believe he volunteered. I also believe that there are many other similar operatives currently in place within our governmental agencies and industry. I know this makes me sound a bit like a conspiracy theorist. But, I think most experts in this field would agree. How could it be otherwise? We have an open society. That is a good thing in many respects. However, to believe that foreign governments do not exploit our open society would be naivete in the extreme.

Thank you for your very interesting comment. I would like to know if anyone who reads this knows the current whereabouts of Krastev. If so, please let me know.

True Nelson

Have You Ever Wondered if You Were a Psychopath / You can test yourself.

2011-09-10T19:48:00.000-07:00

It seems that, temporarily at least, I’m kind of focused on discussing books and authors. And, in fact, if any of you have suggested ‘reads’ that you feel I might be interested in – let me know. I particularly enjoy good non-fiction.

I’d like to recommend to you a book I just finished. It addresses, in layman’s terms, many of the issues we’ve alluded to in our discussions. The name of the book is: The Psychopath Test / a Journey Through the Madness Industry. The author is Jon Ronson. For those of you who do not immediately recognize his name, he is also the author of The Men Who Stare at Goats (book and subsequent movie starring George Clooney). I have not read that book, but I did see the movie. I can’t really say that the movie knocked my socks off. It was OK.

The Psychopath Test helps you identify the psychopath, sometimes referred to as a sociopath. There are many among us. Many are criminals – some not yet incarcerated. And, some are leading politicians and executives in major corporations.

Ronson’s style is engaging. He has an understated sense of humor that accentuates this very serious subject. For some reason he kind of reminds me of Woody Allen with all the perceived psychological frailties of his own; but with the keen insight of a seasoned essayist and storyteller.

I know you’re going to like this book -- and learn some things.

True Nelson

Paul Lindsay, aka Noah Boyd; Marine, FBI Agent, Author - Passed Away on September 1st

2011-09-05T15:56:00.000-07:00

I never met Paul. I wish I had. I knew of him of course. It seems that he was a truly remarkable person.

His family posted on the ‘former Agents’ network’ that Paul had died; and added some brief comments about Paul’s life that I think should be more widely circulated. I hope that they do not mind. He was 68 at the time of his death.

Professionally speaking, as he himself might say, Paul Lindsay was first and foremost a Marine. He was the recipient of two Purple Hearts and the Silver Star for bravery.

Secondly, he was an Agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation for more than twenty years – and, reportedly, solved some major and widely publicized crimes. Another former Agent described him as a cop trapped in an Agent’s suit.

Thirdly, he was an author who utilized the pseudonym Noah Boyd. He wrote seven novels. Two are under contract to be made into major motion pictures.

Three of his more notable novels are: The Bricklayer, Agent X, and Last Chance to Die. I must admit that I’ve only read The Bricklayer; but it was a fast moving and engrossing ride.

According to the information provided by Paul’s family, he “thought of himself as a literary grifter;” someone who, in his words, “appeals to a publisher’s implicit need for profit rather than producing something of literary merit.”

Paul was not only a courageous and decorated Marine; he was obviously a self-effacing author.

My personal impression of Noah Boyd’s writing is that it is about entertainment. If you prefer mind-numbing pages of detailed descriptions of a quaint French café, perhaps you should look elsewhere.

So long Paul.

True Nelson

Terri Horman / The Fifth Amendment / Once More (Part 2)

2011-08-29T15:41:00.000-07:00

There were some interesting comments received due to my recent post regarding Terri Horman.

Although I’ve attempted to address Terri’s current legal position and reticence in a measured way, this seems to have irritated, even angered some.

In reference to the reader who continues to preface his/her comment with "You are a f--king idiot." I didn’t post your comment. The reason is probably obvious – I guess. Nonetheless, you did make a subsequent interesting point. If I may quote you, “Houze told Terri to either keep her mouth shut and do as he says or she would have to find another attorney.” That doesn’t sound like Houze to me, but perhaps I’m wrong. However, it does sound like you have some personal knowledge of the discussion between Terri Horman and Attorney Stephen Houze. My question is, ‘Who are you?’ If you’d care to identify yourself, I’d be happy to publish your entire comment. And, I will include your prefacing statement in an uncensored way.

Another comment caught my eye. "Ms. Porter, Kyron’s teacher, lawyered up within 2 days." I thought that interesting, and it was something I did not know. It would appear that Ms. Porter may be afraid of potential civil negligence charges. I would be interested to know if the Portland School District or the Teachers’ Union is providing the attorney.

Regarding the context of other comments (the ones published), I thought those comments were well-said; and I did consider your opinion. I appreciate you taking the time to state, at some length, your reservations about reading too much into Terri’s legal position. You may be right.

It does appear to me, however, that your comments seem to nibble around the edges that Terri has something to hide and/or she is being railroaded (dare I say framed) by the authorities. In the first instance, I tend to agree. In the second instance, it is rather hard to believe. It would constitute malfeasance of the worst sort. If that is the case, it will ultimately be uncovered.

If I was Terri, I too would have retained a lawyer. If I was completely innocent of wrong doing, I would choose to engage in dialogue with the County Prosecutor, while Houze sat at my side. If he declined to do that, represent me in that way, I would get another attorney. I would not allow the authorities to turn me into a de facto suspect – as they have obviously done with Terri.

True Nelson

Terri Horman / The Fifth Amendment / Once more...

2011-08-28T20:40:00.000-07:00

I should let it go. There will undoubtedly be blow-back in the comments. But, it’s hard for me to swallow this often expressed concept that Terri Horman is simply doing what her attorney told her to do; as if she has no mind of her own. It reminds me of that old catch phrase by Flip Wilson, ‘The devil made me do it.’

Terri Horman is an intelligent, educated woman (at least that’s what we have been lead to believe). Attorneys, for those of you who have little dealings with them, do not tell you what to do. They advise you what to do. That’s why they are often referred to as councilors or advisers.

No attorney would advise Terri to invoke, offer, threaten, refer to, resort to, or suggest the Fifth Amendment unless he felt that she would be putting herself in criminal jeopardy if she was placed under oath. Even with that advisory, she is free to agree or disagree with her attorney.

Let’s stop playing these inane games that have more to do with semantics than reality.

Terri is entitled to use whatever legal protections that are available to her. But, don’t try and paint her as the innocent dupe of conniving attorneys.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman, Terri Horman, Kaine Horman, Desiree Young / Comments...

2011-08-26T20:55:00.000-07:00

There are a lot of interesting comments recently which seemed to accentuate the very divisive nature of the Kyron Horman case.

The only apparent area of quasi-agreement among the public is regarding the law enforcement investigation, and that those efforts have been botched – perhaps from the beginning. That’s, of course, hard to say with certainty. But, I tend to be sympathetic with the readers who feel that way.

I started out with those who were supportive of Terri Horman. I’ve been, from past experience and training, instilled with the professional concept that individuals are innocent until proven otherwise in a court of law. I still subscribe to that philosophy, but this blog is an opinion piece. And, as time went on, Terri’s position became, in my mind, less credible. In a way, I’m amazed at how vehemently some still defend her.

Now, it is conceivable that the comments I've received in her defense are coming from a very small cadre of Terri intimates. Could be, I suppose. However, some readers just may be dedicated to the proposition that Terri is entitled (which she is) to her day in court.

Regarding Kaine Horman and/or Desiree Young, it appears that most have formed an opinion about them also. I suppose that I have too. And, I suppose that we can say with some degree of conviction that Kyron’s family life, if not particularly unusual in this day and age, was less than one would hope for a child. Is every broken home a negative for children? Certainly not. But, I think that most would agree that the Horman family had a lot of conflicting, even troublesome, aspects.

Where this is all going, I cannot say. I hope we will see a solution, at least tangible progress, in the near future. Ultimately, Terri will have to put forth some sort of reasoning or legal argument to obtain custody, or even significant visitation, with her daughter. Her other option is to simply walk away. If that is her choice, I think it will speak volumes.

True Nelson

Kaine Horman vs. Terri Horman / Credibility?

2011-08-23T13:05:00.000-07:00

Based on subsequent received comments, my earlier statement about Kaine Horman probably warrants some clarification. I stated that, “Next to Terri Horman, I would consider him the least credible.” This was said after a ‘reader’ accused me of accepting statements made by Kaine and promoting his credibility, in a nonobjective way, at the expense of Terri Horman. However, I’ve never claimed to be totally objective; but...

Readers have asked:

Reader Comment: Do you think Kaine the least credible next to Terri Horman because he really does not have any credible information, just emotion driven speculation? Or perhaps, that the information he believes has come from MSCO and it's a toss up which side of justified evidence coin it falls on? Kaine did stress his "wife" Terri was fully cooperating with the investigation in an interview one day, then three days later filed papers claiming she tried to kill him and was probably involved in Kyron's disappearance, was a drunk, etc.

Reader Comment: Kaine-the-Evil is yet another tired trick used by the Terribots to deflect attention from their Perfect Princess, Terri Horman. I agree with you, True - I'm no big fan of Kaine, either. But to paint him as the ringleader of some huge gang that is out to hang Terri Horman?! It's just plain hilarious!

True’s Response: I don’t know Kaine, have never met him, and have never talked to anyone who knows him personally. Regarding his credibility, or lack there of, – as far as I’m concerned – it has largely to do with his vested interest in the ongoing court issues, particularly the child custody matter. I have been involved in some of these cases, from an investigator’s point-of-view, and know that parents will often do or say almost anything to achieve their goals and to destroy their former partner – often at the expense of the child in question.

Additionally, sometimes you just have a feeling about someone. I know many of you understand this. I can’t really explain it – but it’s just a feeling. It, perhaps, has something to do with Kaine’s attempts to project this aura of cluelessness when it comes to aspects of his earlier life involving Terri and Kyron. It’s hard for me to accept. It’s hard for me to understand.

True Nelson

Reader's Question: Ellis McCoy, Maxine Bernstein, Sam Adams, and the FBI (Part 2)

2011-08-21T16:55:00.000-07:00

Regarding a Reader’s comment on True Nelson's earlier post, instant date:

A portion of True’s post: “...Reporters like Maxine Bernstein cultivate ‘sources’ (informants), much as the FBI does. It is very much a quid pro quo type of relationship...”

Reader stated: You mean Bernstein became a team player so Kaine Horman would feed her bogus ‘leaks’ about Terri and the search for Kyron. Without an independent source, she has become nothing more than Kaine's puppet and the Oregonian has become a tabloid. Others have been saying this for over a year and it's about time you caught on to what has been happening. It's too bad you and Bernstein are deluded into thinking that Kaine is a credible source.

True’s Response: I don’t recall ever stating that I thought Kaine Horman was a “credible source.” Next to Terri Horman, I would consider him the least credible.

Maxine Bernstein, Kaine’s puppet? I doubt it. Is there a possibility that she is manipulated by law enforcement? Yes.

True Nelson

Reader's Question: Ellis McCoy, Maxine Bernstein, Sam Adams, and the FBI

2011-08-21T10:26:00.000-07:00

Reader Question: Is it normal for either the FBI or the IRS to give heads up to specific reporters? Especially bad ones? (I'm thinking of Bernstein's reporting on the murder for hire plot, which was so full of holes that it made no factual sense.) Could the advance notice have come from the mayor?

True's Response: The FBI has never been shy about seeking the limelight when the opportunity presents itself.

Reporters like Maxine Bernstein cultivate ‘sources’ (informants), much as the FBI does. It is very much a quid pro quo type of relationship. We will give you a heads-up (the FBI might say), as long as we consider your reporting to be ‘fair and balanced.’ Additionally, the FBI might request 'a little favor' now and then.

Whether or not Maxine Bernstein is a good or bad reporter, I couldn’t say. It appears that the Oregonian considers her one of their better reporters. I’m kind of surprised at how often she garners exclusive access. She, or her immediate supervisor, appears to be well connected with various law enforcement agencies.

I don’t believe that Mayor Sam Adams would have given Ellis McCoy advance notice – unless he was authorized to do so by the authorities.

True Nelson

Ellis McCoy / The FBI and their fashion statement

2011-08-19T20:53:00.000-07:00

I don’t know if many of you are following the troubles of City of Portland’s Parking Manager, Ellis K. McCoy. I may be wrong, but it looks like another governmental employee was caught with his hand in the cookie jar – finally. The criminal allegations against McCoy include ‘kickbacks’ for official favors in exchange for lucrative City contracts. But that’s not really what I wanted to discuss…

Did you happen to notice the Oregonian’s front page photo showing FBI Agents leaving McCoy’s City offices (8/11/11)? The Agents weren’t there to make an arrest, according to the article. They were there to serve a search warrant. Even if they had planned to arrest McCoy, or considered it a possibility, the Bureau nonetheless took the time to notify McCoy’s boss, Mayor Sam Adams, in advance. And, apparently, the Bureau gave Maxine Bernstein, the Oregonian’s ace reporter, a heads-up so she could be present when the ‘raid’ occurred.

I was a little taken aback by the photo of the Agents. This is definitely not your father’s FBI. I’m speaking mainly of their attire. The Agents are dressed casually in denim pants and tee-shirts. But, they are also sporting bullet proof vests, low slung automatics, first aid kits, sunglasses (for the glare of indoor lighting I suppose), and specially made shooting gloves. Wow! I was wondering if McCoy wet himself when the Agents burst through the door.

Things have certainly changed since the time when Bureau Agents wore coat and tie, with discreetly carried revolvers, to conduct a rather routine mission.

I particularly got a kick out of the sunglasses.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / Reader's Question about another Blog

2011-08-18T20:35:00.000-07:00

Dear Anonymous, I’ve posted a shortened version of your comment below. And for those readers interested, the website location you mentioned can be found below in your complete comment.

Anonymous said: I came across a site a couple days ago. It has a few email exchanges with a woman that knows the Hormans. There is a lot of interesting tidbits such as how Terri obtained Houze. After reading these I am now back to my first thoughts in the beginning of this case, which is a woman scorned by Kaine. Curious to know…

True’s Response: Much of the information reflected in the referenced material seems to be somewhat dated. It is interesting; but we have no way of knowing the veracity of the writer or writers. I believe I have seen portions of this before. Perhaps, some of the readers of my blog have an insight on these email exchanges that they’d like to share. To my mind the credibility of the emails is doubtful.

Presently, law enforcement and the authorities have created an informational vacuum. I can’t explain this. They seem remarkably reticent. My thought is that, possibly, law enforcement went overboard in the early stages of this inquiry – allowing media reports with accusations and expressions of unsubstantiated confidence in an attempt to control the stage. And, I would guess that there have been some heated exchanges between the Sheriff’s Office and County Prosecutors regarding some of those ‘tactics.’

Anyway, Anonymous, thank you for referring me to the site you suggested – I guess.

Reading it gave me a bit of a queasy feeling.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / Terri Horman / Fred Meyer and other issues...

2011-08-17T13:08:00.000-07:00

For many of us, not a single day goes by that some thought of Kyron doesn’t pass through our consciousness. Many of you have already reached overload on the subject, even burnout. I understand that. The only thing that we, the public, can do, is to remember – each in our own way. It takes effort, but we must persevere.

Not an overly talkative person – in person, I continue to have these many thoughts that my blog allows me to express. However, I am, as you might imagine, discouraged by the conflict that sometimes ensues when differing opinions are put forth. I enjoy discussion, but some enjoy, or are compelled, to strike-out as a form of expression. The anonymity of the Internet makes this possible. Nonetheless, I am not totally innocent of this.

The more I do this (blogging that is), hopefully the better I will do. I certainly don’t want Terri Horman or any of her supporters to hate me. However, if I have no opinion at all on issues such as this, my professional life, my career, becomes irrelevant. Nobody wants that. At least I don’t. When you finally reach retirement mode, or are approaching it, one is constantly trying to reestablish their relevance in society. It, however, becomes increasingly more difficult.

A brilliant scholar and teacher in earlier days, and then suddenly no one, even family, is interested in their readings, research, and experience. A successful business executive, who supervised hundreds of people and millions of dollars in assets, is disappointed when turned-down to manage their grandson’s soccer league. A beautiful woman, in her prime, tries to enhance her aging appearance by getting another tattoo, or buying more jewelry. Life, as it evolves, can be difficult – especially when we focus too much on ourselves. Well, that said, I’m getting kind of philosophical, or even maudlin, which are not the objects of this blog. As we’ve all been told since childhood, we must count our blessings – whatever and wherever they exist.

I'd like to address a recent comment:

Anonymous said: “The restraining order against Terri has been extended until 2012. There haven't been any charges against her; an innocent person would have had their child back long ago. I have been trying to wrap my head around this case and would like to know what you think about the Fred Meyer’s stores. Terri stated that her daughter was sick and the first store didn't have the medicine, maybe whoever was the drop off person was at the second store and Terri and her helper had a mix up on which store?”

True’s Response: I’m afraid that I have nothing much to add regarding your observation. Some might think that when Terri was asked what product she was seeking at the first Fred Meyer – if she was asked – and that product was, in fact, there, that it would reflect a disconnect in her story. And that this disconnect would, in some way, support suspicions on the part of law enforcement – which it might. However, when brought up in court, Houze would simply ask the witness whether or not they have ever gone to a store and not been able to find what they were looking for. The witness would answer, ‘yes, of course.’ Houze would then ask, can you say with absolute certainty that the product, for which you searched, was not in the store. The answer, by the witness would be ‘no;’ end of issue.

Whether or not Terri was attempting to hook-up with an accomplice by visiting two Fred Meyers is anyone’s guess. Perhaps, the Fred Meyer visits had nothing to do with Kyron’s disappearance; and that, at that point, the matter was a ‘fait accompli.’

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / Terri Horman / Here we go again (Part 2)

2011-08-16T11:21:00.000-07:00

I received an immediate, but succinct response from Anonymous, who I featured and responded to yesterday. I do not want to automatically post his / her comment (for obvious reasons) – so I will quote a slightly redacted version. It was but five words.

“You are a f---ing idiot.”

Anyway, Anonymous, I’m sorry you feel that way. I’m always open to learning something new, but prefer constructive criticism that is not so directly and personally phrased.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / Terri Horman / Here we go again...

2011-08-15T20:48:00.000-07:00

Anonymous said: “I can't figure out if you actually follow this story. or just read two lines of an article.. Houze has said that he is unable to get any information from LE regarding the MFH plot.. Terri is not a suspect, she is not charge with anything and therefore LE has no obligation to release any discovery to Houze or Bunch- so if Terri testified, neither lawyer would have any kind of a defense for her- that is why they did not want her to testify.. she would be on the stand, the lawyer would say that LE has evidence of a MFH plot, and it was in the newspaper.. Terri would have absolutely no defense...that was the reason for the discussion of the 5th- there is an ongoing criminal investigation..and they are using that in the divorce case-blaming Terri for something that she can not in any way defend herself against- because LE would not release any info to her lawyers”

True's response: The community of blogging is interesting to me because of the people who choose to interact, and offer their opinions. Some who comment seem nice – someone you’d like to have coffee with, or have lunch and discuss topics of mutual interest. Some seem angry, and immediately preface their comments with an affront – generally in the first or second sentence of their comment. It’s fascinating to read all the comments / statements, and to speculate who the authors are. It’s too bad that each comment doesn’t incorporate a mini resume and a photo. But, I guess that would discourage most people from commenting at all.

Anonymous, No, I don’t read or watch everything about the Kyron Horman case. I have many interests. His disappearance is somewhat of a priority for me, but I just don’t have the time to read and absorb all developments. And, as a result, I sometimes offer an opinion for which I’m not appropriately prepared.

However, if I may – Stephen Houze might not have been allowed discovery regarding the law enforcement investigation of the ‘murder for hire’ plot because Terri Horman was not actually charged. Now, there are ways that Houze could get the information, if he was so inclined – which I don’t believe he was or is. He could, of course, initiate his own investigation. But, I believe he was using the request as a legal tactic or maneuver, a smoke screen more or less.

Let me give you an example. Law enforcement has an informant in the Mafia. Law enforcement attempts to link a member of the Mafia to a crime, based on information supplied by the informant. The effort fails, but said Mafia member realizes that he has been targeted by law enforcement. Although, he has not been charged, and may not be, he demands (through his attorney) to know who the informant is and the allegations against him. To bring the comparative analysis closer, let’s also consider that there is an ongoing civil suit, unrelated to the informant's information, regarding the misappropriation of business assets.

Anonymous, under your reasoning, the informant’s identity should be released – very bad news for the informant whose life expectancy would suddenly take a nosedive.

Terri Horman will be made aware of any criminal investigation and all the evidence, at the time she is actually charged and prior to any trial. In the meantime, she is little more than a witness. In this instance, it appears she is an uncooperative witness.

Terri Horman's attorney invoking the Fifth Amendment has nothing to do with what was printed in the newspaper. It has everything to do with what she might say under oath. Again, I must point out that Terri could simply deny that she engaged the landscaper in any scheme to ‘off’ Kaine. What her attorney (Houze) is afraid of is that she will be cornered on the stand, that Kaine’s attorneys will catch her in lies that constitute perjury – and / or incriminate her in a crime.

As I understand it, the pending trial, of which we speak, is a child custody issue. It appears to me that Terri, for personal and undisclosed reasons, is prepared to forfeit any custodial rights concerning her daughter. For the most part, she already has.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / Comments Addressed / What an Oregon Private Investigator Might Do

2011-08-14T22:12:00.000-07:00

I’m struggling a bit with how to format this blog regarding questions and comments. Some questions / comments are pretty straightforward – and I have been quoting them in their entirety. However, some questions / comments are more complex and thought-provoking – deserving of quote, but I’m not sure that I should reproduce, at length, what has already been published under ‘comments.’

What I’d like to do is focus this blog more towards my answering questions, with the continuing interaction of my readers. And, on occasion, I will bring forth some of my own topics to, hopefully, promote discussion. Does anyone have any ideas on how to best format this concept?

I do have expertise in law enforcement, judicial process, and investigations. I think there must be many readers – out there – who have questions they would like to ask. The following are a couple of examples regarding recent comments. In one instance, I will quote the entire comment; but in the other only a partial quote.

A complete quote:

Beejay said: Since you are a licensed P.I., and in Oregon, and you have some familiarity with the locale, I wish you would discuss exactly what an Oregon P.I. might do, at this juncture, to move this case forward. Personally, I would love to see some gum-shoe work, aimed at discovering more about the landscaper involved in the sting. And, perhaps, some of his employees, family, and housemates. Harkening back, I suppose, to the old days when PIs working missing persons' cases didn't have electronic evidence. They hung out in dark corners and chatted people up.

True’s response: An interesting question regarding the Kyron Horman investigation. I could write volumes on this.

Initially, I would like to clarify that I am not now actively involved in private investigation work. I continue to refer potential clients, but that is all. I do some consulting, but that is limited in nature – and is often pro bono. My principal professional interest is this blog and the resulting interaction with the public.

What might a PI do in the Kyron Horman case? This would be a difficult endeavor, because of everything that has gone before. Potential witnesses have probably been repeatedly interviewed; and may resent, or are guarded concerning, private inquiry on behalf of Kyron’s biological parents. The potential for civil suit would be a major consideration for all, and would be perceived by many to be the motivating factor behind the private investigation.

My thought would be to not necessarily plow the same ground. A private investigator could setup a private reward fund, possibly sponsored by others. You understand that the current reward offered has many stipulations to include – public disclosure and publicity, resultant testimony, notoriety, and even possible personal danger. To come forward under those circumstances takes an exceptional person. That said, there could be a private reward fund organized, guaranteeing anonymity, and payment for basic information such as the location of Kyron. This would require a ‘hotline’ of sorts, where people could leave information that would generate investigative leads for follow-up outside of the normal law enforcement channels. Caveat: The authorities would not welcome this tactic and would in fact resent it.

Any such investigative efforts, as described above, would have to be under the auspices of an attorney representing Desiree and/or Kaine. If not, all the developments by the PI would be automatically subpoenaed by Stephen Houze. However, an attorney, working with a PI on behalf of Kyron’s parents, can preserve some attorney / client relationship – a legal construct more difficult to pierce.

Furthermore, PIs rarely hang out in dark corners chatting people up – maybe once in a blue moon. This method would be rather expensive for most clients; and most PIs would consider it unproductive and unprofessional.

A partial quote (see comments for complete quote):

Anonymous said: True, you state: "Unless you are a personal and very protective friend of Terri’s, I would think you would take the position of get on the stand and tell them what they want to know. Terri is playing defense – pure and simple." I am neither a personal nor very protective friend of Terri - in fact, I don't even know her. What do they want her to say? That their suspicions…

True’s Response: Thank you for a measured and considered comment. I understand that you feel Terri should be presumed ‘innocent until proven guilty.’ I subscribe to the same philosophy. People, I believe, read my blog because they are interested in my opinion. My opinion is that Terri is playing defense. If you don’t know her, you must have some of the same feelings about her conduct. I think that one of my readers said, “If you have nothing to hide, you hide nothing at all.” I agree with that sentiment in part. None of us is perfect. And, I suspect that each of us has something that they would prefer not to become public. Nonetheless, a missing child trumps most of those personal concerns. Everyone’s cooperation is expected no matter the potential for inconvenience, or momentary embarrassment. If Terri Horman is truly innocent of participating in Kyron’s disappearance, I can’t imagine the reason for her intransigence. Anything is possible – of course. But, I continue to believe that Terri has something of value to offer in this case.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / Terri Horman / Fifth Amendment Revisited

2011-08-13T17:39:00.000-07:00

Anonymous said: “Once again, Terri Horman never invoked her fifth amendment right. Her attorneys brought it up that it was her right to invoke and she would do so if she had to protect those rights. The judge agreed and the divorce was abated. Mentioning you would invoke your Constitutional RIGHT and doing so are two different things.”

True’s Response: Anonymous, a hair-splitting argument indeed. You clearly are bothered by my term ‘invoked,’ – wherein I had previously offered my opinion that Terri Horman had invoked the Fifth Amendment. You have brought this up before. Attorneys do not and are not allowed to offer the Fifth Amendment as a legal ploy without the specific consent of the client.

The dictionary has more than one definition for ‘invoke.’ The most appropriate reads as follows: ‘to invoke is to quote, rely on, or use something such as a law in support of an argument.’ That an attorney would present this argument or statement on her behalf, without her consent, would be – in my opinion -- untenable, if not malpractice.

I’m not sure why you persist in your opinion. You must be aware that Terri Horman has rejected the opportunity to testify under oath. You must admit that she has something to hide. If not, why wouldn’t she testify? I suppose, you might opine that she does, perhaps, have something to hide, but it is irrelevant to the disappearance of Kyron. I’m sorry, but I consider that position counter-intuitive, even silly. You might believe that the authorities are attempting to trick her (frame her). Well, she has a very talented and experienced attorney representing her. He would not allow that to happen – nor would the judge.

Unless you are a personal and very protective friend of Terri’s, I would think you would take the position of ‘get on the stand and tell them what they want to know.’ Terri is playing defense – pure and simple.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / A Civil Action?

2011-08-12T13:14:00.000-07:00

During our lengthy discourse on various topics concerning the disappearance of Kyron Horman, a couple of readers mentioned / asked about the possibility of a civil suit initiated by Desiree Young and Kaine Horman (Kyron’s biological parents). The defendants in such a suit would be, I imagine, the Portland Public Schools, Terri Horman, and possibly Multnomah County.

I’m not an attorney, but here is my generalized opinion. I think at some point a civil suit is a viable option for Kyron’s parents. However, the timing is very important. Initially, there is a perception issue. If Kyron’s parents jumped too soon to file suit, they may jeopardize public support. They would be immediately accused of being more interested in money than they are in the recovery of their son.

Secondly, as we all know, Kaine and Terri are already involved in a civil suit regarding custody of their daughter. And, as we’ve seen that suit seems to be stalled – pending, I’m guessing, possible developments in the criminal investigation.

In reference to the criminal investigation, headed by the Multnomah County Sheriff’s Office, there seems to have been little or no recent progress – at least none that they would care to discuss with the public.

I’m sure that Desiree and Kaine are receiving appropriate legal advice from private attorneys. At some point, I believe that they will move forward civilly. The difference between a criminal and a civil case is the required proof. Criminal cases require proof ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ – a fairly high standard. Civil cases require only ‘a preponderance of the evidence,’ a lesser standard, basically 51%.

Although a significant monetary settlement is possible, even likely, the real benefit of a civil case is to bring forth the evidence – a public disclosure. Many depositions would be taken. And, many facts about the disappearance of Kyron would become known. For example, what was Skyline Elementary’s responsibilities, and actions or lack there of?

Efforts would be made to depose Terri Horman. She would probably, again, invoke her Fifth Amendment protection. However, in a civil case, this does not look good, and could negatively impact a defendant’s position, and positively influence potential monetary damages.

The filing of a civil suit, timing wise, has limitations. This becomes a little confusing and depends to a degree on what type of suit is filed; and precisely when the clock is started. Generally, in Oregon, we are looking at a two year deadline.

Perhaps, there is an attorney out there who will weigh-in on this subject. I’d be very interested in what they would have to say.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / Legalization of Marijuana / Thoughts and Comments

2011-08-09T21:59:00.000-07:00

It’s been awhile since I last posted. The Kyron Horman investigation actively continues according to the Multnomah County Sheriff’s Office. However, they’ve been very quiet about the nature or direction of that investigation. I’ve written extensively about this case from many aspects, and some of you have patiently stuck with me. At this time, I have nothing more to say regarding Kyron’s disappearance or current whereabouts. I continue to feel a little guilty that I dragged you along on a trail to nowhere. It was something that I had to personally resolve. And, at this point, further discussion of the ongoing law enforcement investigation seems tired and redundant. We will all have to wait the authorities’ next pronouncement – if and when that should occur.

Due to my overriding interest in the Kyron case, I failed to answer / respond to some interesting questions that I received on various topics. I apologize for that. The following is one of those questions:

Anonymous asked: “I would be interested if you think prison populations would be reduced if and when marijuana is decriminalized / legalized. I don't have the latest stats, but recall reading that a large number of people are in prison due to marijuana related sentences.”

True’s response: I have read that 50% or more of prisoners under incarceration at the State and Federal levels have been imprisoned due to, or related to, the ‘illegal drug’ trade. And, as a percentage of our population, the United States ranks number one, among all nations, in prison population.

For someone who has never used illegal drugs, including marijuana, it is difficult for me to say that it should be decriminalized or legalized. But, I think that time has come.

Many in law enforcement feel that marijuana is a ‘gateway’ drug that inevitably leads to other more addictive substances. From my perspective, the same argument could be made about alcohol. In fact, I believe that more crimes are committed under the influence of alcohol than any other drug – to include all forms of crime, murder, robbery, rape – and, of course, vehicular crimes are off the chart.

What would happen if marijuana and, perhaps, some other illegal drugs were legalized? No one knows for sure. Many would claim that the results would be catastrophic. I think that society would find methods to cope.

I do firmly believe in the following regarding those addictive drugs that are now considered illegal:

The sale or furnishing of drugs to minors, including alcohol, should be treated very seriously.
Drug testing in the work environment ‘for cause’ should be a given.
Being under the influence of drugs should not constitute a defense, or potential for mitigation, in any criminal case. Drugs should not trump personal responsibility.
The addiction to drugs should not, in any way, constitute a disability demanding special preferences as a class – or special compensations such as SSI.
Rehabilitative programs, such as are now in place for gambling addiction and alcohol addiction, should be readily available.
Emphasis should be placed on education of our children – starting at a very young age.
Prison or jail time should be a last resort. Those individuals not involved in violent crimes, should be held in a venue more conducive to rehabilitation.

That said, this would be a major transformation for our society. However, we don’t have to look too far for similar examples. The ‘prohibition era’ comes to mind. More recently, I can easily recall when most forms of gambling were illegal. Now, casinos are everywhere, and States consider it a major form of revenue. Are the proliferation of casinos and State sponsored gambling a good thing? No, I don’t think so. But, we’ve learned to accept it, some even embrace it. At least, we don’t spend a lot of governmental resources trying to squelch gambling, a previous endeavor by law enforcement that failed abysmally.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / The Guatemala Connection / The FBI / and Burning Bridges (Final)

2011-08-01T22:05:00.000-07:00

As many of you have, I got caught-up in the Kyron investigation. It was easy to do. It’s kind of embarrassing that my suspicions led nowhere and that those efforts were so publicly aired. However, that’s water over the dam and I’m happy that I was able to resolve that haunting question. I’m also thankful that the two ladies in Guatemala promptly responded rather than simply disappearing. And, finally, I’m sorry Kyron. I wish I could have done more.

The reason that I described, at length, my experiences in following this suspected ‘lead,’ is that I felt the public (my readers) should know how these things work. The point that I was really trying to establish is this attitude on the part of law enforcement that they are above acknowledgement of anyone’s efforts to assist. Businesses are not run this way. Why should public agencies like the Multnomah County Sheriff’s Office or the FBI operate in this imperious manner? Oh, I know they would counter with, ‘We are too busy to respond to everyone.’ Not even a perfunctory post card? Or, is it, perhaps, a defense mechanism? They can’t be criticized for not following up on a lead, unless it could be subsequently proven that they actually received it.

In regard to the FBI, once through the training and socialization process to become an Agent, it is very much like belonging to a fraternity. As time passes, you tend to remember the good aspects, and the bad becomes less recalled, or simply humorous.

I belong to the Former Agents’ Society. It is a way of keeping track of old friends, keeping up with developments in the Bureau, etc. I regularly contribute to a charitable facet of the Society, to help fund scholarships and to assist former / retired Agents who have fallen upon bad times. Over the years, I felt I belonged – part of an extended family. This is my last year of membership in the Society. No big deal, I know. But that fraternal feeling is no longer there. It’s time to move on.

I, also, belong to InfraGard which is a collaboration between the FBI and the private sector. The mission of InfraGard is to bring the knowledge of the private sector, corporate security members, into the FBI fold – to increase the FBI’s knowledge of our infrastructure, and how best to protect same. I’ve been a member for years. Although InfraGard members have the Bureau on speed-dial, the FBI is not interested in using that channel for information regarding kidnapping cases – possible exception being the kidnapping of a corporate executive.

Didn’t I tell you that the FBI is blind and deaf without public assistance? Top management in the Bureau understands that. What’s ironic is that some of their field supervisors don’t appear to get it. What? Too busy? Businesses are busy too; but some how they make time to acknowledge the public. It’s just a matter of good business.

Anyway, it is some how liberating to have come to this juncture in my life. The Bureau owes me nothing; and, I, in turn, owe them nothing. Chapter closed.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / The Guatemala Connection / The FBI / and Burning Bridges (Part 6)

2011-07-31T17:08:00.000-07:00

On July 3rd, I sent out an ‘open letter’ to my reader or readers in Guatemala. Surprisingly, I received a response almost immediately. A day or so later, I received a second response.

Both, as it turned out, were women working and residing in Guatemala – who reportedly do not know one another. However, they shared a strong interest in the Kyron Horman disappearance, and admitted following the case on my blog and others. Whether or not the two of them accounted for the numerous hits from that country, I do not know. I’m guessing that they probably did. Since my ‘open letter’ to Guatemala, the hits have rapidly fallen-off.

The first woman is named Jane. She and her husband manage marinas in Guatemala. She is from Texas. She and her husband traveled by boat from Texas to destinations unknown – and finally settled in Guatemala. She sounds a bit like a free spirit – a personality trait that I’ve always admired. In addition to the marinas, they have an online newspaper. I don’t believe that she would mind if you cared to check-it-out. Her website is www.riodulcechisme.com/.

The second woman is named Nancy. She is originally from California. She is currently operating a school / orphanage in Guatemala. Her website is www.semillasdeamor.org/.

These women have obviously taken the road less traveled. I have asked them questions about Guatemala, including anything they might know about child trafficking. They both understand it to be a serious problem in Guatemala; and have offered to help in the search for Kyron – if, in some way, that should become appropriate. They acknowledged that the Kyron case is little known in that small country, and advised that they have seen no local news regarding it. I asked why they have followed the investigation so closely. Both of these ladies, in different ways, indicated that Kyron’s disappearance had touched their hearts.

Now, I know there are readers out in the blogosphere who are anxious to tell me, ‘I told you so.’ Go ahead – get it off your chest. Nonetheless, I do not plan to apologize for anything that I did. Well, I think there is an apology due to Jane and Nancy. I’m sorry that your interest in Kyron caused me to be suspicious of your intentions. I hope there are no hard feelings, and hope we can remain in touch.

Perhaps the authorities know something we in the public do not know. I sincerely wish that to be the situation. The reception I received in attempting to offer a lead in the case; well, I just don’t believe my experience was so unusual. I think a lot of people have received a similar experience, maybe worse. I get this sinking feeling that law enforcement is settled-in, waiting for the big break. And, that they are not particularly interested in leads that might require some effort to check-out.

Am I disappointed in my experience with the FBI? Yes. That will be explained in more detail in my next post; which will constitute the ‘burning bridges’ part of this epistle.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / The Guatemala Connection / The FBI / and Burning Bridges (Part 5)

2011-07-30T08:54:00.000-07:00

On June 23rd, I received a response from the Bureau regarding my visit to their office.

The response was, and I paraphrase here, that the ‘Duty Agent,’ with whom I had spoken on the 21st had made a formal report to the relevant Supervisory Special Agent.

This unidentified supervisor said that the Kyron Horman investigation is being led by the Multnomah County Sheriff’s Office, and because I had already furnished them this tip, the FBI would be taking no action. Additionally, if I had continued concerns I should take them up with the Sheriff’s Office. And, that any other action, on my part, was entirely up to me.

I was somewhat baffled at the Bureau's response. This is a very delicate point, and I want to make sure that everyone understands. When I was in corporate security, our success was judged on not only the effectiveness of our investigations, law enforcement relationships, and expert advice – but, also on our management style, and the professional interaction with all of our employees and the public.

I was disappointed, even miffed, by the FBI’s supervisory lack of training in public relations. More importantly, this condition seems to have become the trend of most law enforcement agencies. The very old fashioned concept of ‘public service,’ is an apparent dead issue. What did I expect? It’s hard to say, but to put it in the vernacular, ‘The FBI blew me off.’ A simple thank you, and we will forward the information onto the Task Force, would have been much easier to swallow – a minor courtesy extended for ‘my service.’

Anyway, on the authority of the FBI, I was free to do whatever I wanted. And, the open letter to Guatemala was what I decided to do. The letter did resolve some of my concerns and issues. I will tell you more about that.

One of my readers, BeeJay, responded to my Part 4, with remarkable clarity and insight:

“I understand your disappointment in your FBI reception. Especially since you seemed encouraged awhile back when talking about now that the FBI had made a commitment (of up to 6 agents...). Despite the lack of PR consideration, or even businesslike courtesy, apparently all these agencies are shorthanded these days and may have little time for what we once considered de rigueur. As to their treatment of your data/evidence, here's another possible interpretation: they already know (i.e., have proof positive) that there is no Guatemala connection. Maybe they already have reliable evidence that tells them why Kyron was abducted. And it wasn't for a trip out of the country.”

Thank you BeeJay. Well said.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / The Guatemala Connection / The FBI / and Burning Bridges (Part 4)

2011-07-29T17:12:00.000-07:00

Some of my readers continue to believe that I’m a charlatan with a vivid imagination. My response to those individuals is why do you read my blog; much less bother to take your valuable time to comment. Apparently, you have more time on your hands than I do. But, that’s an aside…

As I said in my prior post, no response was forthcoming from Mr. Peters (SAC Portland FBI), or his secretary. Now, you understand that some sort of response would have required very little effort – ‘Thank you for your letter of June 7th. All information furnished by the public concerning the Kyron Horman matter is appreciated.’ That’s all. That would have been the end of the story, as far as I was concerned. But, the Portland FBI, in their infinite wisdom, decided that no response was a good response. Implying, I suppose, just one more kook – former FBI Agent or not.

Now, I had a couple of possibilities. I could write an open letter to the ‘Guatemala reader,’ as most of you know I ultimately did. However, at the time, I thought the person or persons might be frightened by my interest, and the hits from Guatemala would simply evaporate.

The second option was to take the matter one step further. One thing you learn as a private investigator is that ‘faint heart never won fair maiden.’ In other words, although rejection is a very real possibility, you must push on until you hit the wall.

On June 21st, I made a personal visit to the FBI Office in downtown Portland. For those of you who have never been there, it is a rather intimidating venue. First you need to talk on a telephone to the receptionist, who is sequestered behind the locked front entrance, and is additionally sitting (although within view) in a booth off the reception area, behind what I assumed to be bullet proof glass. This is the new Bureau, very officious and remote. In my day, visitors to the FBI simply walked into the reception area and were greeted by one or two very friendly, often attractive, receptionists. There were comfortable sofas and chairs in which you could relax while waiting to see an Agent. Mind you, I’m not criticizing the Bureau’s new face; I’m just saying that this is testimony to what we’ve become.

The Receptionist who, incidentally, was very friendly and helpful asked me the nature of my business. I introduced myself as a former Agent, and that I had recently sent a letter to Mr. Peters, and was wondering if he would have a few moments to meet with me. She made a telephone call, and then ‘buzzed’ me in to the reception room. She advised me that someone would meet with me shortly. I waited. It seemed like an inordinate amount of time passed. The receptionist would occasionally smile at me – as if to say I’m sorry about the wait.

Finally a young man, dressed in a suit, entered reception and introduced himself as a Special Agent. He was what we used to call ‘the Duty Agent.’ He apologized that Mr. Peters was not available to meet with me. I said that was OK – thinking I would have been pleased if Mr. Peters had taken the time to meet me; but, it was probably ill-advised to just drop-in.

Obviously, the Agent had been checking on me while I waited. He asked if I was carrying a gun, although clearly I was not – dressed in slacks and a short-sleeve shirt.

We adjourned to a small – closet-sized – room off the reception area – two straight-backed chairs and a small table.

I explained my concerns about the Kyron / Guatemala connection and furnished the Agent with supporting documentation. He seemed interested. He mentioned that his background was in computers. He said that he would take my information to the appropriate Supervisor, and let me know.

As we departed, he said a nice, but somewhat odd thing. He said, “Thank you for your service.” It took me aback, I wasn’t sure if he meant my military service, or my FBI service.

This Agent was young, perhaps new to his job, and personable. I thanked him for his time, and asked him how he liked his job. He very enthusiastically said, “It’s a great job.” It was a sad thought that came over me. This enthusiastic young man was probably in nursery school when I entered the Bureau.

To be continued…

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / The Guatemala Connection / The FBI / and Burning Bridges (Part 3)

2011-07-28T20:17:00.000-07:00

I think I’ve mentioned in one of my past blogs how the Patty Hearst case could have been concluded months earlier – except for the fact that a FBI Agent chose to ignore information furnished by a member of the public.

Remember what I said about how critical public support for law enforcement agencies is? And that this synergy is absolutely essential in solving complex investigations. Well…

The more I researched the child trafficking conditions in Guatemala, the more I felt there might be a possibility – a long shot I realized – that the person or persons following the Kyron Horman disappearance, via my blog, might know something of significance. I didn’t necessarily suspect that the visitor to my blog was the actual ‘kidnapper’ – highly unlikely in my opinion. I just thought the person might know something that could lead to Kyron’s location; but that they were reluctant to establish contact with me or the authorities in this area.

I finally decided to compile the information, document my concerns, and send a letter to the Multnomah County Task Force. I sent that letter on November 1st, 2010. I received no acknowledgement whatsoever.

What did I expect them to do? My thought was that they, perhaps, could coordinate with Google, and attempt to ascertain the city in Guatemala from which the hits were coming. With that information, the FBI Legat (in the area) could contact local law enforcement, inform them of the Kyron disappearance, and solicit whatever assistance might be available. I also thought it might be worthwhile to publicize the case locally in that region, and to promote the reward offered for information concerning Kyron.

I waited. The hits continued. Again, the more the blog discussion centered around Kyron, the more frequent the visits. I talked to friends about what I was observing; some of them had a law enforcement background. All seemed to agree that it was a long-shot, but not inconceivable, that there could be a connection to Kyron.

On December 13th, I wrote to Detective Tony Young, in care of the Medford Police Department. I described the situation to him. I explained who I was, and that I once was a deputy sheriff with the Jackson County Sheriff’s Office, as well a former Special Agent of the FBI. I received no acknowledgment from him regarding the receipt of my letter and the supporting information.

Most of you would probably say, ‘Well, True, you did what you could – let it go.’

If I may – this might sound silly – I’m not a religious person – maybe somewhat spiritual. But, I’ve always had this feeling that we are put here for a reason; and that at some point, in our long and largely mundane lives, we will be tested. In some respects, I’ve been tested many times. But, one is never sure when the ‘real’ test will come along. I just couldn’t let it go. The hits continued. The Kyron Horman investigation appeared to be dragging-on with no tangible results as far as the public was aware. It was becoming a ‘cold case.’

On June 7th, 2011, I wrote a personal letter to the Special Agent in Charge of the Portland FBI Office (Alan J. Peters). Again, I set forth the information, identified myself as a Former Agent, and explained my concerns. I received no acknowledgement.

The hits were increasing. In one 30 day period, I had more than 160 hits from Guatemala. The Analytics capability showed most of my hits within the U.S., Canada was second and Guatemala third. The fourth place country was far back – approximately seven or eight hits from the U.K., and none from Mexico.

To be continued…

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / The Guatemala Connection / The FBI / and Burning Bridges (Part 2)

2011-07-27T21:28:00.000-07:00

As previously stated the FBI depends, to a great extent, on public support and the public’s admiration. Why admiration? Well, without it the Bureau’s effectiveness is marginal at best.

I want to digress just a bit, because I think it is important to reestablish credibility with some of the readers. I was a Special Agent with the FBI for approximately seven years. Prior to that, I had been in local law enforcement. Subsequent to the Bureau, I was in corporate security for an international company. After retiring from that Fortune 100 Company, I entered private investigations, which I did for more than ten years. I say this not to bore you, but to help you better understand who I am. I’ve been doing this sort of work for approximately 40+ years.

Some of you have strongly disagreed with certain comments that I have made. And, I suppose that I should admit that some of my comments were half-baked – well maybe three-quarters baked – and were possibly not given appropriate consideration. Nonetheless, the comments were almost always sincere and always, from my perspective, truthful. It’s difficult to put one’s credibility out for public examination on a frequent basis – which is, of course, the nature of running a blog. However, I am proud of my career, and have learned one heck-of-a-lot along the way. And, candidly, I like sharing and interacting with my readers.

What’s all this about? Well, it has to do with the Kyron Horman case and my disillusionment with my ‘alma mater,’ the FBI; as well as my displeasure with the efforts of the Kyron Horman Task Force.

Although I started my blog almost a year before Kyron disappeared, it became quickly evident, as time passed, that most readers tuned-in to my blog because of their interest in Kyron. My readership quickly expanded. As some of you are aware, blogs and websites have Google Analytics which allows the operator to count hits received, and to determine from where the hits originated. It is a very interesting format that, to tell you the truth, I don’t completely understand. It’s fun and interesting to look at. I’ve received hits from almost all over the world. But, most of the hits I receive are from English speaking countries – the U.S. is number one, Canada is number two, and it falls off from there.

As an aside, one can only imagine what other capabilities the Google network possesses. Talk about ‘big brother,’ watching.

Months back, I noticed this inordinate interest in my blog coming from Guatemala. The more the discussion centered on the Kyron Horman case, the more frequently the hits emanated from that small country. Sometimes, three to five times a day. Another capability of Analytics is that it tells you if visitors are new, or are return visitors. The indication from Guatemala was that the visitor or visitors were not new; reflecting that the hits were repeatedly coming from the same individual or individuals. Additionally, the visitor or visitors were obviously staying to read the comments at length, because the Analytics format tells you the average time of the visits. This consistent interest from Guatemala seemed strange to me – even suspicious. During the same period, I was receiving no hits from Mexico or any other country in Central or South America.

I began to track and graph the hits to my blog from the various countries in an effort to facilitate subsequent understanding of the Guatemala significance. Additionally, I started researching criminal activity in Guatemala. It probably comes as no surprise to most that Guatemala has an active sex trade and also considerable problems with child trafficking. Many of the children issues of which I read had to do with the illegal ‘adoption’ of Guatemala children by Americans; and the potential legal efforts to recover some of these children. It was clear that Americans or others with money could find almost anything they wanted in that country. Children were often the innocent victims.

The question, for me, became, OK, now what? Could this information be important in efforts to locate Kyron? Was I overreacting? Was this a potential lead?

To be continued…

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / The Guatemala Connection / The FBI / and Burning Bridges

2011-07-26T18:00:00.000-07:00

I had to give this a lot of thought. Some of my friends and past colleagues will probably be disappointed, even angry. However, I’m at a time in my life when there needs to be no more illusions or hypocrisy. I’m free to say the things that I consider important – things that, perhaps, others need to know.

There have been a number of questions about my current status with the FBI. Some, I believe, thought that I might be blogging and commenting on behalf of some hidden agenda; and that my blog reflected some sort of collaboration with law enforcement. I’ve always said that this was not the case. Many continue to doubt my word.

I was a Special Agent with the FBI. For various personal reasons, I resigned from the FBI under very positive circumstances, and I went on to other career opportunities. For the most part, I was happy with my decision to leave the Bureau. Nonetheless, I’ve always harbored a certain fraternal or nostalgic feeling toward those years when I served – until now.

For the appropriate context of what I’m about to say, you need to clearly understand some phraseology often used. This is not about semantics. This is about a concept of the criminal justice system that many in the public do not completely comprehend.

The ultimate strength of law enforcement, including the FBI, over the past many decades has been the involvement of the public. Even now, the Kyron case will probably be unraveled by someone in the public. They (a member of the public) will find Kyron. Or, they will offer some bit of information that will lead to him. Or, someone in the public who knows something of importance (possibly a co-conspirator) will call, write, or personally contact law enforcement with the clue (the fact) that will lead to a successful conclusion in the investigation. That’s how it works. The FBI does not ‘solve’ cases. Their expertise is in the area of receiving, analyzing, coordinating and documenting evidence to be used in a court of law.

Local law enforcement sometimes ‘solves’ the more minor offenses – basically those personally witnessed by local law enforcement officers. Mostly police officers witness, as we all know, misdemeanor or traffic violations. They see the crime. They make the arrest. Case closed. They atypically are a principal witness in a major felony like murder.

On the other hand, the FBI seldom, if ever, actually witnesses a crime. And, it would be exceptionally rare for them to make an on-scene arrest, based on their individual experience as to what occurred. If, for example, an Agent witnessed a shoplifting, he has no more authority to pursue and arrest than any other member of the public.

Police officers are the ‘thin blue line’ that protects the general public from the everyday offender. The FBI is strictly an investigative agency.

Resultingly, the FBI depends almost exclusively on information obtained from the public or information referred by a local law enforcement agency. When the public begins to turn their back on the FBI, their effectiveness quickly evaporates. The agency becomes figuratively blind and deaf.

As many of you know, I got very interested in the Kyron Horman disappearance and the resulting investigation. I tried to follow the case closely without becoming obsessed by the subject. Kyron’s disappearance affected many; but the principal victims and grievers were his parents Desiree and Kaine. If they were good and loving parents as they project – well, all parents and grandparents could easily imagine the devastation they must feel; and shared, in part, their grief.

You know by now, if you’ve followed my blog, that I became suspicious of a possible connection, probable lead, regarding Kyron’s disappearance – a lead that involved the small country of Guatemala. I would like to tell you how that evolved and what ultimately transpired.

More to follow…

True Nelson

The Death Penalty / Anthony Graves / Response to Comment

2011-07-25T23:23:00.000-07:00

I feel compelled to respond to Anonymous. Readers may want to read the entire comment/s which were precipitated by some of my statements about the ‘death penalty.’ Anonymous countered and made a pretty good case for the abolishment of the ‘death penalty’ in the United States. I believe him / her to be good-hearted, but I do not share the point of view.

Anonymous said, in part...

“Certainly it would be preferable to spend the rest of my life in prison rather than executed, if I were an innocent person, with hopes that some law firm would believe in my innocence and take my case and fight for me. Why don’t you ask Anthony Graves, the latest innocent person released from death row, that question as he sat on death row for all most 18 years waiting to die. Do you know why he was convicted and sat on death row? The DA hide the fact that he had been told, twice in fact, by the real perpetrator that he had lied to him and Anthony Graves was NOT involved at all. There was not one shred of evidence to …”

True Nelson Response:

“Graves, 45, was convicted in Burleson County in 1994 in the 1992 slayings of Bobbie Joyce Davis, 45; her 16-year-old daughter Nicole; and four Davis grandchildren ages 4 to 9. The conviction depended, in part, on testimony from codefendant Robert Earl Carter, who implicated Graves in the horrendous crime.”

“But it was testimony Carter — convicted for the same murders — recanted moments before he was executed on May 31, 2000.”

“To the Davis family, I am sorry for all of the pain that I caused your family. It was me and me alone. Anthony Graves had nothing to do with it. I lied on him in court. ... Anthony Graves don't even know anything about it.”

Whether or not the last minute, prior to execution, statement by an alleged accomplice that Graves was not involved constitutes innocence. I’m not sure. Texas government officials seem to believe that there was a miscarriage of justice. Graves is currently awaiting a possible civil settlement from the State of Texas in the amount of $1.5 million.

You, Anonymous, seem to focus on people like Anthony Graves. I do not know the details of this case, but it sounds like an aggravated miscarriage of justice.

However, I tend to focus on people like Timothy McVeigh and Ted Bundy; wherein humane execution is almost too light of a sentence. Unquestionably, the world is a better place without them. If they had been sentenced to life in prison without chance of parole, they would have maintained their celebrity status – even in prison. The families of the victims would continue to suffer every time their names were mentioned; or these killers were interviewed on television, or a newspaper article was written about them, or some naïve attorney, anxious for exposure, put forth the latest theory of their innocence.

Anders Behring Breivik, of Norway, has just murdered approximately 90 innocent people, mostly young adults and children. You, of course, would consider Norway’s system of justice far superior to ours. They do not have the death penalty; and, in fact, their maximum prison sentence is 21 years. In my opinion such a sentence is far too inadequate for his monstrous crime.

Anonymous, I don’t expect you to agree with me. I’m sure that we are very different in our world view of issues like Capital Punishment. Perhaps this difference of opinion is based on the experiences one has as they go through life. Perhaps it is a genetic predisposition that we have little or no control over.

Some people spend their time equivocating the value of human life, and the injustice to a very few. The fact of life, as I understand it, is that life is never fair. One man goes to prison for a crime he did not commit due to an unethical, reprehensible prosecutor. Another man is run-down by a drunk driver and killed.

Life isn’t fair.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman Case / Readers Comments and Questions

2011-07-24T15:55:00.000-07:00

I’d like to take this opportunity to address some recent comments:

Reader Comment / Question: “I've been wondering what is Houze's responsibility? Is it only to his client? If he knows what happened to Kyron, what is his duty?”

True Nelson’s Response: Attorney Houze has the same responsibilities, regarding Kyron Horman’s current status, that each of us in the public has. However, he is not obligated to assist law enforcement in efforts to locate Kyron through his association with Terri. Steve Houze is a decent man. If he knew where Kyron was, he would somehow reveal that information. Where he and I differ is that he would do almost anything to protect Terri Horman, even if he personally suspected that she was involved in Kyron’s disappearance. It is an attorney’s unfortunate obligation, and he could face possible disbarment if he conducted himself otherwise. Not everyone is cut-out to be a criminal defense attorney. It requires, at times, compartmentalizing and a professional devotion / acceptance of subjectivism, or a personalized theory that society’s moral codes are relative and therefore subject to individual interpretation. For most of us, this is difficult to understand or accept. Steve Houze would never ask Terri Horman if she knows the whereabouts of Kyron. He would be afraid of the answer. However, if Terri Horman volunteered that she did not know where Kyron was, or what happened to him, Houze would accept her version without challenge. If Houze knew the location of Kyron, he would attempt to enter negotiations with the prosecution, or inform Terri that he can no longer represent her.

Reader Comment / Question: “You should know better than most that when the investigators home in on a suspect and are building their case, they will use statements to convict, and rarely if ever, use statements to help eliminate one as a suspect. They have been even known to conceal favorable information from the prosecution and/or defense.”

True Nelson’s Response: You have just described a bad law enforcement investigator, and an equally bad prosecuting attorney. Yes, they do exist. They are, however, far outnumbered by lazy investigators and lazy prosecutors.

Reader Comment / Question: “Terri has not taken the fifth. And we do not know if she is or isn't cooperating with LE's investigation through her attorneys.”

True Nelson’s Response: You are wrong. Terri Horman has invoked the Fifth Amendment – technically she had it invoked on her behalf. This legal action could not be done without her approval. That she would accede to such a tactic tells me that she is not cooperating.

Reader Comment / Question: “The American people who believe in the death penalty can stand with pride and their heads held high, as this country is one of the top 10 nations with the highest number of executions. This is the order and we stand 5th. We have such lovely bed fellows, don't we! China, Iran, North Korea, Yemen, United States, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Syria, Bangladesh, Somalia. Think we should switch to stoning to death a guilty person in a public square so everyone can participate? How about a public hanging so all can stand around and cheer?”

True Nelson’s Response: I don’t know where you got your list, but I do not accept it. I suppose it depends largely on how you define a country and define the ‘death penalty.’ Nonetheless, I, too, do not like the association with those countries under any circumstances. Your comments, I must say, are the typical rhetoric of the anti-death penalty segment of our population – comprising approximately 50% of US citizens.

No, I do not favor stoning or public hangings. I favor humane treatment of prisoners, including humane execution – if and when it is found necessary and appropriate. In rebuttal, I guess that I would ask you the following questions:

Have you or your loved ones ever been victimized by a murder?

Have you ever knowingly looked into the eyes of a murderer?

Have you ever been to the scene of a murder?

Have you ever worked in or visited a prison?

Have you ever read a book such as “Whoever Fights Monsters: My Twenty Years Tracking Serial Killers?”

If you answered ‘yes’ to any of the above questions, I accept your good-faith argument, but respectfully disagree.

Reader’s Comment / Question: “How hard is it for you to comprehend that Terri knows nothing about Kyron's disappearance and she said so for an entire month. No amount of questioning will change that fact.”

True Nelson’s Response: I find it very difficult to comprehend.

Reader’s Comment / Question: “True Nelson, this is not meant to argue with you any fine points re taking the Fifth Amendment in a Civil Case (Divorce Action). In many states in the US adultery is still a criminal action. I have witnessed a person in a divorce case taking the Fifth when questioned if they committed adultery with a said person. Any admission to adultery could have lead to a criminal charge being brought against them under that State's law. The LE were using Kaine's Divorce action to attempt to get information so to bring criminal charges against TH. There is no doubt, at least in my mind, the LE were and are after her also re the alleged MFH (murder for hire) the lawn man claimed she asked him to do. If she had not taken the Fifth in that civil case and been asked questions about any relationships outside her marriage with other men and the lawn man and admitted to knowing him that admission could have possibly lead to and opened the door to further questions bringing up the alleged MFH. Thus, information gotten in that civil case could have been used to bring charges for a criminal case re MFH.”

True Nelson’s Response: Yes, I understand your argument. Although a divorce action is civil, the attorneys representing Kaine would have used their opportunity to destroy Terri’s credibility as a mother for Kiara. What better way then to show Terri’s involvement in a crime. Nonetheless, I think the judge could have framed the testimony in such a way as to not allow it to become a fishing expedition.

I’ve tried to explain this as best I could. It is very difficult to put into words. And, I can’t really support it with pristine legal arguments. My contention is, and I believe that almost anyone using their common sense would agree, that Terri Horman is playing defense at the expense of a child. To me, she has zero credibility as a potential custodial mother, as well as zero credibility as a human being – and, I believe that will ultimately be the court’s finding.

Regarding a successful prosecution, I suppose as time goes by that becomes less of a possibility. But, let’s just say, there is a prosecution of someone other than Terri. And, it is found that she had little or no involvement in Kyron’s disappearance. Would that change my opinion of Terri as a mother or human being? No it wouldn’t. If she is innocent of Kyron’s disappearance, now is the time to offer her complete cooperation regardless of the downside.

Regarding a prosecution of Terri involving Kyron’s disappearance, I guess that I’ve sort of moved on. If and when she is finally prosecuted, in some manner, for Kyron’s disappearance, she may very well be found ‘not guilty;’ but she, without doubt, will not be found ‘innocent.’

For many of you, let’s just agree to disagree. Some of you will support Terri regardless. I don’t know who you are. It doesn’t really matter. For my part, until Terri demonstrates that she cares about someone other than herself, my opinion will remain unaltered.

Reader’s Comment / Question: “Since 1973, One hundred and thirty eight innocent people who sat on death row, some up to 18 years, because their respective juries bought into the above line from the LE/DA, have been released with evidence of their innocence.”

True Nelson’s Response: I accept your numbers. I don’t mean to quibble, but they were found to be ‘not guilty’ based on the available remaining evidence. They were not found to be ‘innocent.’ I know you will jump at the opportunity to counter with the new, the great DNA evidence. This is a form of evidence, yes, but it is not conclusive.

Example: A rape case where semen DNA is discovered. This could have been left by a previous consensual partner. This does not automatically exclude a potential rapist. The existence of a man’s DNA found in or upon a murdered woman, does not, in and of itself, constitute murder; or the lack of a DNA specimen exonerate.

Furthermore, I’ve never said that our system of justice is 100%. But the 138 that you cite were convicted by a jury of their peers, and later the convictions were reviewed on numerous occasions.

I suppose your argument would be that it is preferable to spend the remainder of one’s life in prison on the outside chance that your conviction might be reversed, rather than to be executed. I don’t happen to share that opinion.

I suppose, for the sake of consistency, that you do not support Oregon’s Death with Dignity Law. I do.

I suppose, for the sake of consistency, you are against any form of abortion. I support abortion under very limited circumstances; to include rape, incest, or life threatening danger to the mother.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / Terri Horman / The Fifth Amendment (Part 2)

2011-07-17T19:48:00.000-07:00

Some of you continue to argue the Fifth Amendment aspect of Terri Horman’s legal defense – some in a very civil tone – some not so much.

As I’ve said on many occasions, I’m not an attorney; and am not prepared to argue chapter and verse on Constitutional law; and I really never intended to do so.

Attorneys would argue that my opinions would be shot to pieces in the first year of law school. I’m prepared to concede that.

I suppose I look at some of these legal stratagems from a layman’s point of view – that the legal system is largely playing games that often merely prolong suffering. Attorneys are the main proponents and participants in these games – often for their economic benefit.

Example: One of our death-row inmates, here in Oregon, is currently beseeching, dare I say begging, the court to allow his execution to proceed. He admits guilt, and would just like the opportunity to exit this world with some semblance of dignity. Sounds to me like a murderer who, for once in his life, wants to take total responsibility for his actions. But, no, there are attorneys who are fighting to protect him from himself – stating that he is incapable of making that decision.

I am prepared to admit that our legal system is, in fact, just (as in justice) – at least 95% of the time. I also believe it to be grossly inefficient and unbelievably expensive. Are you aware that the United States has about one attorney for every 265 Americans? Are you aware that each and every attorney in the United States expects to make a handsome living?

Regarding Terri Horman, the fact that she would invoke the Fifth Amendment under any circumstances, when the life of a small child is in the balance, is unconscionable. If she knows of Kyron’s current condition, she may have decided that, at this juncture, ‘it’s every man (or woman) for themselves.’ If she does not know Kyron’s current condition, or to her his current condition is in doubt, her position in taking the Fifth is nearly an unparalleled act of cowardice. And, why anyone would continue to support her, including her immediate family or friends, puzzles me.

“And I wish no one to believe anything I have written, unless he is personally persuaded by the evidence of reason.” Descartes

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / Terri Horman / The Fifth Amendment

2011-07-15T16:54:00.000-07:00

Re: My posting of 7/14/11: Kyron Horman / Where is he?

And the following comment...

Anonymous said...

"I thought asserting one's 5th Amendment right not to self incriminate was a Constitutional right. Aren't Judges supposed to uphold the Constitution, not pick & choose which citizens can avail themselves. Reminds me of Nixon's point of view."

I enjoy the discussion. That’s why I do this blog. However, sometimes it becomes downright tiresome.

If any of you read some of my early posts, you will notice that I often defended Terri Horman. I thought the Multnomah County Sheriff’s Office was in over their head, and didn’t realize it. More importantly, they suggested, hinted, stumbled and leaked information in a way that I thought inappropriate.

However, in a sense, Terri Horman let me down by her subsequent conduct. She became, in my mind, indefensible. I am no lawyer. However, I’m not stupid. To my readers who insist on defending or rationalizing her conduct, maybe you should spend your valuable time elsewhere rather than sending me comments. I have given this a lot of thought, and I have an opinion. Many of you may not like it. It’s just my opinion. I understand, as well as you, innocent until proven guilty. OK, I get it.

Regarding the Fifth Amendment, I might ask: Have you actually read it? It covers several areas relevant to the criminal justice system.

Anonymous, regarding your comment, the segment of the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution to which you refer is, “nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” Did you note the ‘criminal’ part of that? And, would you care to share your legal opinion as to how that applies to a divorce and child custody matter (a civil case)? And, what may I ask, has that got to do with Nixon?

On second thought, I really don’t care to hear your opinion.

Now, I know that attorneys have a way of parsing almost any implication from the Constitution; and, of course, judges are attorneys. In that regard, I must opine, God help us.

The bottom line is, and I hope I make this very clear, if something walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it must be a duck.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / Where is he?

2011-07-14T22:24:00.000-07:00

I will talk more about the Guatemala connection to the Kyron Horman disappearance soon, and answer some of your questions about that. There are some things that I need to work through. This was not a game I was playing to generate interest in my blog. I had, what I considered to be, legitimate concerns which now seem largely unfounded. For that, I apologize.

I still harbor the belief that Kyron was transported out of the area. If alive, and I hope he is, out of the U.S. seems logical – south into Mexico or beyond most likely.

All of you realize the chaos that exists in some parts of Mexico and Central America. Corruption is endemic and crime an everyday aspect of life. But, in all countries there are decent and concerned citizens that would do whatever possible to help find a child.

On the other hand, if an international aspect exists, some of my readers have suggested Canada as a possible destination. Possible, I suppose, but not realistic in my opinion.

I have been interested in reading the comments. Some have attacked me for my position on proceeding with a judicial process. One reader said, quite bluntly, that I was “off my rocker.” Of course, I never know from whom these comments have emanated – could be a Circuit Court Judge (doubtful) or could be someone who has overdosed on CSI.

The point to which I was alluding, in perhaps a too unequivocal fashion, was that the most opportune time, in my opinion, for a trial is now. The investigation was intensive and comprehensive. Law enforcement has continually alluded to developed evidence; even, let’s admit it, a suspect. Now, they want to quietly slip out of the room and hope that nobody noticed.

I know perfectly well what the hang-up is. We all do. No Kyron.

We could compliment the authorities on their long hours and diligent efforts, extensive interviews, exhaustive searches, voluminous reports, etc. Now, I believe everyone is entitled to see their findings. The authorities have invested a lot – agreed. However, the public has also invested a lot in time, concern – not to mention picking up the tab. The public should, in this particular case, demand something for their investment.

I know the system. I know exactly why the authorities hold close the developed information. They don’t want to compromise a future prosecution should there be one.

I guess my stated opinion was ill-advised. Capital murder – Terri Horman - probably not possible based on what I now know. I suppose I hoped that others might know more. That said, is there not some way to get her into court? On something? Even the divorce hearing / the child custody matter / you notice how that has been postponed. It’s all a choreographed, interminable legal game that’s played. Why can’t a judge simply say, this is a divorce / custody hearing, and I’m sorry Terri but you have no reason or right, as far as I’m concerned, to invoke the Fifth Amendment? Postpone, postpone, how long? Where’s Kyron? How long must he wait?

True Nelson

Kyron Horman relevance? / Stolen Social Security Numbers & Birth Records

2011-07-11T22:28:00.000-07:00

"TRUE - I just finished clicking through some of your early blogs about the russian spies and the doitchin BS...

how does the FBI discover that someone is using the social of a deceased individual?

is it some nuclear google search methodology?

if there is a program in place to identify database inconsistencies such as a dead individuals social, I have a question that might reflect back to the kyron horman disappearance??...

does the SSI number of a child, who has never paid taxes or been employed, hold any long term value to embedded operatives in our country?"

True’s Response: Dear Stoned Immaculate (wow, what a moniker; and no, just because it is a pet peeve of mine, I won’t say anything about your lack of capitalization): However, interesting questions. I’ll give you my generalized answer.

Social security numbers are vastly overused for very routine matters – doctor’s visits, credit card applications, etc. Children’s SSNs are ‘stolen’ and used in identity theft cases much more than adults’ SSNs. The reason is that a baby or small child’s Social Security records are clean, no prior employment, no earnings, and no credit inquiries. This would be an important consideration for someone attempting to assume a false identity.

Regarding Doitchin, he cruised through a background investigation for an enforcement position at the State level – all the time using the identity of a dead child.

I would like to point out that it should be a common practice for parents, when asked for a child’s SSN, to respond: Why do you need it? And can I give you some other form of identification. At times, these records have been stolen and sold by dishonest clerical employees. However, the best identity would be a small child that has died. Sometimes, these birth records and SSNs are actually purchased from the ‘distraught’ parents.

How does the FBI, or other law enforcement agency, discover that someone is using a fraudulently obtained SS number? Well, to my knowledge it is largely happenstance. With our current computer systems and massive databases, it would appear that this would be relatively easy. My opinion is that the authorities, the government, really do not want to know – unless there is some aggravating circumstance. Reason? It is such a part of the illegal immigrant fabric, and our economy, that it would cause incalculable social problems (in the opinion of some) if social security numbers were routinely checked for validity.

What is the long term value of the stolen identity (SSN and birth records) for a criminal or an illegal? I’m not exactly sure. There is a Master Death Record with the Social Security Administration, but it is not readily available. The Social Security Administration sells the records, but they are quite expensive. Some national information providers have purchased the database and give out this information for a fee.

If using a false identity, and one tried to collect Social Security, SSI, Medicare, etc., I’m guessing and hope that the fraudulent identity would become apparent.

I understand that many ‘illegals’ pay into Social Security, but never obtain benefits. I suppose this is an economic benefit to the US government, and an incentive to not look too closely. However, I wonder who is the biggest criminal – the ‘illegal alien’ trying to scratch out a living, or our government who takes their money and laughs all the way to the bank?

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / Caylee Anthony / Any Similarities / Postscript

2011-07-09T09:20:00.000-07:00

Thank you for some interesting comments. I encourage all my readers to view them in their entirety for context. I’d like to respond to a few of them.

“Anonymous said...
What we saw in the Casey Anthony case was a jury that did not follow instructions.
They were told not to …”

True Response: An excellent comment and very insightful; allowed me to consider the Anthony case from a little different perspective.

“Juli said…
First of all, why are you so sure we are looking for a body and not a little boy?”

True Response: I am hopeful that Kyron will be found alive, and is the very reason that I am advocating an effort to bring this case out into the pubic spotlight – win or lose. I sense the authorities are folding their tents.

“Cindy said...
Your statement that “based on what we know” Terri Horman should be prosecuted for murder is incomprehensible and bewildering.”

True Response: When I said ‘we,’ I was not referring to you and me. I was using ‘we’ in a generalized way, including what presumably is known by law enforcement; but has not been publicly released.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / Caylee Anthony / Any Similarities?

2011-07-08T17:53:00.000-07:00

I’ve been asked for my impressions of the Casey Anthony trial – for the murder of her daughter, Caylee. The question came from a person also interested in the Kyron disappearance.

As I’ve stated many times, ‘suspects’ or ‘persons of interest,’ in any sort of crime are innocent until found guilty by a jury of their peers. I think we all realize that our jury system of justice is not perfect; but it is, of course, one of the best. Nonetheless, mistakes are made. The OJ trial comes immediately to mind; but there are many others. The Casey Anthony trial may be another example of jurors drawing conclusions based upon their own limited life experiences, and the cleverness of an attorney’s presentation. Based on what I’ve seen and heard, I can understand the jury being unable to convict for 1st Degree murder; but their inability to convict for Manslaughter seems incomprehensible.

I watched on television as juror, Jennifer Ford, justified the jury’s decision. I later read the transcript. Her main point, and apparently the point on which she rationalized much of the jury’s deliberation, was that “they (the prosecution) didn’t prove the cause of death.” Someone should point out to her that in many murders, upon discovery of a body, the cause of death cannot be determined. However, the circumstances of the death indicate otherwise.

Use your imagination. Husband strangles wife in a fit of rage and then buries her in the begonia bed. Two years later the body is discovered. Husband claims his wife died of natural causes, and he couldn’t afford a proper burial. Believable?

Another interesting point in this trial was the Defense justification for Casey Anthony’s, some might consider, bizarre behavior after her child went missing, which was allegedly caused as a result of childhood sexual abuse by her father and brother. This, in turn, caused her a belated form of irrationality. OK – possible. However, there was no evidence presented concerning said allegations, and her father denied them. Keep in mind that Casey was an inveterate liar – a fact proven in court. As frequently happens in these cases, Casey refused to testify; so the allegations regarding her childhood abuse had to be rendered second hand, by the Defense, as a theory. Why this is allowed, I don’t know. But, this Defense strategy ‘that I was abused as a child,’ seems to, figuratively speaking, be the soup du jour, cooked up routinely, and often used to explain the unexplainable – particularly in murder trials.

Relevance to the Kyron Horman case? I’ve received a lot of criticism because I felt that, based on what we know; Terri Horman should be subjected to a trial sooner rather than later. The inevitable response will be, ‘True, you idiot, didn’t you see what happened in the Casey Anthony trial?’

Yes, I saw. I guess my response would be: Would it have been better if Casey hadn’t been tried at all? I don’t think so. Based on what the prosecution could develop, they presented their case. Sure Anthony was found ‘not guilty,’ which is not the same as saying she was innocent.

Regarding Kyron, how long do we wait? You give me an answer. Do we wait until the body is found? Do we wait until the witnesses have died, moved away, or have lost accurate recollection? Or do we accept the fact that law enforcement and the prosecutors gave it the ‘old college try,’ and just couldn’t put it together? Cold case / dead file / game over.

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / an Open Letter to my Readers

2011-07-07T10:36:00.000-07:00

Regarding the avid reader in Guatemala, I’m still communicating with her – and have recently sent her several questions that I hope she will help me with. I don’t plan to identify her; but I will share potential comments she might have – if that’s OK with her. I know some of you will say I made this all up. I didn’t.

I had noticed a regular pattern of hits coming from Guatemala, and it did seem suspicious. I couldn’t imagine that anyone in Guatemala would be that interested in the Kyron Horman case – unless they had a particular reason to be. It appears that my concerns were unfounded. Nonetheless, that has not altered my previously stated opinions or ‘theories.’

I received many comments, some sincere, helpful and concerned, some downright nasty. I plan to spend some time over the next few days addressing comments.

I got a chuckle out of one recent comment that stated something like, ‘you are not important, but very likely impotent.’ Forgive me dear ladies, but most of you must agree that such a comment must have emanated from the fairer sex. A man might try to insult me in many different ways, but not in that manner.

I will write more soon.

Best wishes to all,

True Nelson

Kyron Horman / Open Letter to Guatemala / Postscript

2011-07-04T12:06:00.000-07:00

Dear Readers,

I’ve heard from the ‘frequent reader’ in Guatemala, and she has been able to allay some of my concerns regarding said country. I’ll write more about that soon.

She has no connection with the Kyron Horman disappearance – other than a fervent interest, apparently, in the case.

For the moment, it is the Fourth of July, a time for family and friends. A time to celebrate that we are living in greatest country the world has ever known.

Best wishes to all of you.

True Nelson