Joe Biden vs Donald Trump... Nikki Haley

 

Before long, we will be selecting a new President; and, as circumstances now appear it will be Joe Biden verses Donald Trump.  I don't feel comfortable regarding either.  Friends suggest voting for the one that I dislike the least.  I suppose that is something I should consider.

Donald Trump’s legal woes:  I am not sure what to make of them.  Most of my career in law enforcement and corporate security revolved around laws and putting together criminal cases that were compatible with the law.  The violations to which Trump is now charged, esoteric to say the least, one would have to be an attorney to understand the elements of the crime and their significance, if any.  One of the charges is that Trump consistently overvalued his properties to obtain loans.  What in the heck does that mean?  Did anyone lose money, was anyone harmed?   Who is the victim?  Where is the victim?  Who is demanding criminal recourse?  Isn't this a civil matter?

Secondly, Trump allegedly attempted to undermine the Presidential Election of 2020.  Well, he did claim there was fraud involved.  However, I can say with total confidence, fraud did exist in the election.  Fraud always has and it always will.  The question is ‘how much’?  Thanks to our Electoral College System, fraud is somewhat minimized.  How?  Because some states have considerably more fraud than others.

On the other hand, I have a good understanding of the criminal conduct associated with the Biden family.  This is the selling of political access and presumed favors from the likes of Joe Biden, the former Vice President, and now President.  Vast amounts of money have questionably relocated from outside operatives (including the Communist Chinese) to the Biden family’s coffers through many suspicious companies used (undoubtedly) to ‘launder the money’ or disguise the origin.  This is the prima facia indicator of all organized crime operations.  The money was unquestionably illegal compensation intended to obtain access or political favors from Biden.  Considering these actions by the Biden family, your best argument, your only argument, might be…  ‘That’s what most politicians do.’  OK, sadly, you might be right.  None the less, the Biden family’s illicit operations included fraudulent money laundering and tax evasion… prosecutable crimes.  Furthermore, Joe Biden must be exceptionally good at selling political favors, he and his extended family have become multi-millionaires on Biden’s basic government salary… the American taxpayer is an easy mark… ignorant sheep… why not take advantage?  Under the current circumstances, no sensible person would vote for Biden.

However, many otherwise sensible people will vote against Trump; and might hand over a second term to Biden.

It is time US citizens acknowledge that President Biden is not a fully functional human being (sad but true).  We must consider: ‘Who exactly is running our country and fraudulently propping up the Ghost President?’  Can we afford to gamble that no foreign government will use Biden’s cognitive decline and incompetence to further their own gains?  And, if so, what will be the consequences?

My hope (if there is still time) is that a strong contender in the Democratic Party will pull forward and allow (dare I say force) Joe to retire.  And give the Democrats a modicum of pride in their vote.

Regarding Donald Trump, if he was to win the Presidency, he will be endlessly bogged down in the criminal and civil charges that are stalking him.  The Presidency requires someone’s full attention.  Trump carries with him almost insurmountable criminal and civil litigation.  Are those charges against Trump politically motivated?  Yes, of course, almost certainly.  But still, we will need a ‘full time’ President to lead us through the many critical times we will be facing during the next four years.  Not someone largely distracted, as Trump will be, in personal legal matters.  And what may possibly include jail time or restrictive probation status.  Can a President pardon himself?

Just heard an interesting poll.  If the Presidential Race was held today, Trump would beat Biden by ‘one percentage point.’  DeSantis would beat Biden by ‘three points,’ and Nikki Haley would beat Biden by ‘eight points.  Nikki Haley could be a big winner in the election, if she could dislodge Trump.  She will have my vote in the Oregon Primary

 

True Nelson

JR-15, Operational Firearm, modeled after the AR-15... but made for children!

 

I don’t want to spend a lot of time on this subject, but it was mentioned to me by some friends.  I said I would check it out.  Initially, I thought this was a joke; but sadly it is not.

A company Wee 1 Tactics has developed a smaller version of the AR-15… a version designed for kids.  It is referred to in their advertisement as the JR-15.  It is 20% smaller than the original, weighs just 2.3lbs, a single shot, using .22LR ammunition.  Its cost is $400+ dollars retail.

The Forrest Gump quotation comes to mind… ‘Stupid is as stupid does.’  Not sure if this applies to the manufacturer or to any potential buyers (maybe both).  I am sure this manufacturer plans to make a lot of money.  And I am fairly sure there are a few fathers out there who feel this will be a wonderful gift for their son, or daughter.   Hopefully, there are mothers out there who will veto the idea.

The image of the JR-15 directly relates, and negatively so, to our times.  I am, of course, referring to school shootings committed by grade schoolers.  Are we not all aware that times have changed and not for the better?  School shootings, often involving a young person, are a national tragedy.  Are we not paying attention?

Yes, our young people (if they express interest) eventually need to be familiar with the safe handling of guns.  I did that with my own son and daughter.  But, I didn’t do it with a miniature AR-15 which is, and is marketed as, nothing more than a ‘toy.’  Albeit a potentially dangerous and deadly toy.

True Nelson

 

The Biden Family... Are you whistling in a coal mine?

 If you aren’t particularly concerned about what is occurring in our country politically; and nonetheless you consider yourself ‘informed’… well, I would describe your position as, not to be too offensive, Whistling in a Coal Mine.

The last couple of years that I was an Agent with the FBI in San Francisco, I was assigned to the Organized Crime Squad.  So, I hope that gives me some insights that you might find helpful.

Organized Crime investigations start with a premise; if not initially ‘probable cause’, at least a reasonable, documentable suspicion.  The first source might be a public agency of some kind.  It might be an informant with knowledge.  It might even be a well-documented news report or article.

Based on that information, there are considerable preliminary investigations and interviews.  I won’t go into the details.

Did you know that the most difficult problem for those involved in ‘organized crime,’ and includes all manner of organized crime (illegal drugs, embezzlement, extortion, political corruption etc.) is what to do with the proceeds, THE MONEY.  For the most part, in an organized crime structure, there is no problem acquiring the money.  It’s how do you then explain the money, and subsequently convert that money to something you can use.  Well, if you are a petty criminal, you can just try dealing in cash… but that can be a concept short-lived and easily detected.  Big time criminals, on the other hand, who deal in millions of dollars have phony businesses, numerous bank accounts, and money laundering schemes both in the U.S. and overseas.  Money laundering:  This is their expertise and potentially their weakness.

The law enforcement investigator’s principal objective is to ‘follow the money.’  The IRS employs experts in following money through various banks and investment schemes to the final recipients of the suspicious / ill-gotten / money.  Does this in any way remind you of the Biden family’s situation?

When Hunter Biden’s international and very lucrative ‘consulting’ became more suspect… inexplicable, and politically embarrassing… he became more creative (so to speak).  He became a painter – of abstract art.  There was no developing his artistic reputation and the praise of art critics.  Not at all.  Purchasers of his artistic endeavors seemed to stumble over themselves to buy his paintings.  How very curious.  That said, Hunter was not prepared to say who purchased the paintings or how much they paid.  Strange, don’t you think?

There are many laws that cover the ins and outs of money transferred through our banking systems.  Specialized laws designed to ferret out illegal profits from organized crime and tax evaders.  The experts to follow this money are specially trained and experienced Agents of the Internal Revenue Service in conjunction with the FBI.

Last comment:  Does it concern you that officials of the Federal Government stopped the IRS investigators from continuing to follow the money in the Hunter Biden inquiry?  Why would they?  All the indicators of fraud and corruption are there.  What’s the answer?  I could spell this out for you, but you already know the answer.  At least all of you other than those who continue to ‘whistle in a coal mine.’

True Nelson

Hunter Biden / Christopher Wray (FBI) / the Association!

 

H

1)    After all that has come down regarding Hunter Biden, Joe Biden and the Biden family, does anyone now doubt that there are corrupt / illegal practices involved in enriching the Biden Clan?  How did this corruption metastasize to such an extent?  Why didn’t Barrack Obama, as President, put a stop to it when he was President?  Is corruption so endemic in political circles, particularly in DC, that everyone, to one degree or another, plays the game, or simply ignores it to preserve their own jobs?  And, of course, corrupt elected politicians have many well-heeled and influential accomplices in government, business, as well as academia… all those (and there are many) also feeding at the trough.  ‘We the people’ are ‘we the chumps’ who pay for the fraud and corruption.

As a former FBI Agent on the Organized Crime Squad in San Francisco, it is my opinion that, under customary legal standards, the Biden entanglements are adequate grounds to open a Federal RICO investigation (Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization Act).  Look it up.  Read the presumptive elements of the crime.  You will probably agree?  I think most former and current Bureau Agents would.

2)  Is Christopher Wray, Director of the FBI also corrupt or simply ‘looking the other way’?  As a former FBI Agent, I have my opinion.  At the very least, he is either over his head in the ‘deep state’ or simply watching out for himself – probably both.  I’m sure the credibility and integrity of the FBI is of little or no concern to him.  A lucrative post-Bureau career is his principal focus.

True Nelson

 

The Dying Citizen, a book by Victor Davis Hanson... and, if I may, state in conclusion.

 

A considerable time has passed since my last blog post.  I'm discouraged, even kind of sad.  It is as if this country is transforming, declining before my eyes.  And, it is not a pretty site.  Some friends, some family (not all of course, just a few) have expressed the viewpoint that I've become (or are becoming) some sort of disagreeable 'old timer'; and that, in one way or another, maybe unknowingly, I am often referring to the 'good ole days.'  Even though, in my apparently antiquated opinion, those 'good ole days' are in fact behind us.

Life never was perfect, often hard for many; but comparatively speaking, we had laws that were enforced.  We didn't have the massive numbers of homeless, drug addicted, and what one might accurately describe as 'every conceivable variety of criminal imaginable roaming our streets.'

I live near Portland, Oregon.  Not too many years back, Portland was a beautiful and welcoming city.  It isn't any more.  People are leaving in droves.  Did you know that the population of Portland has declined the past three years; and that this rush to the door is the first time it has occurred in Portland's history.  Those that can are packing their bags.  I, too, will eventually move on one way or another.

As a former FBI Agent, I think I can say, with some insight, that 'said agency' has been politically corrupted by Christopher Wray and his entrenched supporters.  Those who serve him should hang your heads in shame.  'Take a knee to the woke.'  'Agents have you no self-respect, no pride?'

I encourage anyone who happens upon this post to read (and buy) Victor Davis Hanson's new book... The Dying Citizen. It's not a particularly easy read, but it is a wealth of information that every 'decent citizen' should read and open their minds to understand.  Get your high-lighter out, and make some notes as you read, you will become a better 'informed citizen.'

True Nelson

Oregon Election Results (2022) - Disappointing

 

The results of the recent election (2022) were a little surprising to me and somewhat disappointing.  It seems the good old US of A is continuing to trend downward – just my opinion.  With the Democrats still apparently hanging on to the catbird’s seat – assuming they take the Senate as is anticipated – we can look forward to more crime, more illegal drugs, more illegal immigration, higher inflation, unrestricted abortions up to the moment of birth, and more socialism promulgated.  Incidentally, Oregon passed, what is considered to be, the strictest gun control measures in the country.  Is gun registration the prelude to confiscation?  Perhaps.

That said, it appears that everyone, with the possible exception of 'the ordinary' Oregon citizen, got something – perhaps the repercussions are yet to be known.  I’m trying to be circumspect about the situation.  I was but a wee babe when WWII ended.  In life, I had good parents and grandparents, many good friends, and received a Bachelor’s and Master’s Degree at a price I could swing while I worked full time.  Furthermore, I have had a wonderful wife of more than 50 years and, all things considered, a good life.  All I can say is ‘good luck’ Oregon.  You’ll need it.

One more thing, I believe there is the underlying issue of Donald Trump – his influence on the 2022 election and his apparent intention to run for President again.  I don’t believe his participation was particularly helpful this election.  I am hopeful that he will not run in 2024; and if he does (regardless of his Democratic opponent) I think he will lose.  I voted for him the first time… or perhaps I voted against Hillary Clinton.. perhaps both.  And I think Trump was a pretty good President; but his time has passed.

True Nelson

The Abortion Issue in the Coming Election (November 2022)

 

The November (2022) election is near. And, to say that this election is important might very well be something of an understatement.

What about me? What do I think? I am starting to lose faith in the American voters. Why? Well, there is ‘inflation,’ ‘unprecedented increases in crime,’ ‘overwhelming illegal immigration, ‘fentanyl overdoses in hundreds of thousands; stock market and retirement funds collapsing in value; and the voting public, it seems, are preoccupied, and divided by the issue of ‘abortion.’  There for, the abortion issue might decide the election outcome.

OK, let us consider the abortion issue:

Recently, The U.S. Supreme Court found Roe v. Wade to be unconstitutional. And that, the question of abortion rights, or lack thereof, should be decided by each State.

Hardly, a crisis in Oregon; but many think it is… or more likely they wish to make it a crisis. I am in Oregon, so I would like to give you a little history of abortion in this state:

1969:  Oregon became one of the first states to legalize abortion. SB 193 legalized abortion during the first 150 days of pregnancy (5 months). Under the following circumstances:

*The baby has a physical or mental handicap

*The baby was conceived by rape or other criminal intercourse (to include statutory rape, prostitution, incest, etc.)

*The pregnancy poses a substantial risk to the mother’s physical or mental health.

1973:  Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton established abortion on-demand in America from conception to birth.

1983:  SB 397 repealed the 1969 law, along with all restriction on abortion. The bill was passed for the expressed purpose of protecting unrestricted abortion in Oregon if Roe/Doe were ever overturned.

2017:  HB 3391 forces insurance companies operating in Oregon to fully cover abortion procedures with no co-pay or deductible. The law also expanded taxpayer funding of abortion, effectually making abortion free in Oregon.

MY OPINION:  It is very unlikely that abortion would ever be entirely banned in Oregon; but if common decency were to prevail, some restrictions would/should be made.

In my opinion, only a fanatical proponent of eugenics or a sociopathic personality would promote the killing of a baby at the moment of birth. Is there anyone among us that cruel, that insensitive? Yes, of course there are people like that. On the other hand, most believe, under certain circumstances, abortion is warranted. And, most also believe there are other more humane guidelines to limit abortion.

I believe that an abortion should be available, with restrictions incorporated. The 1969 law, modified in some respects by medical professionals, might be a place to start. Unrestricted abortion, to me would be, and is, unconscionable.

 

The FBI... What in the World is Going On? (Part 3 / Conclusion)

 

                                                                                                            

The current dubious status of the Federal Bureau of Investigation is without question due to… leadership.  Most of you have figured this out already.  The Director is Christopher Wray.  Is he qualified to be the Director?  Well, let’s see:  The FBI has approximately 25,000 employees.  About 11 or 12 thousand are Agents.  The remainder being support personnel.

So, is Wray qualified and experienced enough to lead such a mammoth organization?  To evaluate that, we need to know something about his background.  Wray comes from a wealthy family and his father is an attorney in a prestigious law firm.  Wray was sent to a private school, the Phillips Academy in Massachusetts.  I understand this is a tony school for kids from prominent (aka wealthy) families.  He went from said preparatory school to Yale where he got a degree... in philosophy.  I went to a public college.  I wasn’t even aware that they had a degree in philosophy.  At least it never crossed my mind.  I had to look this up.  It turns out that a degree in Philosophy is not that useful in most areas of occupational endeavor; but you do become an interesting conversationalist with the ability to understand and consider both sides of a discussion.  From there he went to Yale’s Law School and yada, yada, yada.

Being a connected young man, he found ready employment as an attorney and then as an Assistant United States Attorney.  Doors opened… well you know how it goes.  OK, what’s my point?  The point is that prior to becoming Director of the FBI, he had supervised (and I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt on this) no more than 25 or 30 employees.  Suddenly, he was put in charge of 25,000.  Can you see why there might be a problem here?

Chris Wray may be a nice man, but he is way over his head; and, as a result, easily manipulated by others around him.  I’m sure he was never particularly interested in being FBI Director and probably still isn’t; but he is interested in an illustrious, lucrative, subsequent career in the federal government or with a pricey law firm.  For his ambition, the men and women of the FBI suffer the inescapable indignities and perception of being politically biased… which unfortunately, under current management, they are.

So, where do you find a good, qualified FBI Director.  My suggestion is that they look for him or her, in a highly considered law enforcement agency, or perhaps the military.  After all, aren’t they looking for a leader rather than a politician with no background in leadership.  Do you think Wray got his job due to his resume?  I don’t think so.

Well, you might say… Trump picked him.  That’s true.  But maybe Wray’s most prominent qualification for selection was that he was perceived to be easily manipulated – which has proven also to be true… in spades.

True Nelson

The FBI…What in the World is Going On? (Part 2)

  

I only served under Hoover for a short period of time.  He died about five or six months after I entered the Bureau.  It could be correctly stated that he ruled the Bureau and his Agents with an iron hand.  The rules for conduct were extensive, extreme and some bordered on the eccentric.  For example:  Agents were not allowed coffee breaks while on duty - that was in or out of the office.  I soon learned that said rule was often, almost universally, ignored by the Agents.  Nonetheless, if caught by a supervisor, you could be officially censured; and if on probation status at the time, it could mean 'adios.'

Another requirement, more difficult to circumvent, was that New Agents were limited to how long they could be in the Office.  Reason given:  FBI Agents do not solve cases in the office.  I recall the Time in Office (TIO) allowed was about 10% of the workday.  That was approximately an hour because ten-hour days were expected.  For new Agents with no assigned car, this was a problem; and often meant standing at the front door in the morning waiting for a more senior Agent to arrive and ask (beg) to use their car for part of the day to cover leads.  If that failed the public library was a place to work on reports.  And yes, you had to walk.  This was the typical 'First Office' which lasted about nine to ten months.  Finishing that, you were assigned a 'Second Office.'  In my case, it was San Francisco.  I felt that I had hit the jackpot.  That's when, finally, they treated you like a regular Agent... and cars were available.

I had been a deputy sheriff, prior to the military, and before I entered the Bureau.  It was the Bureau’s custom or policy to send five or six Agents to make an arrest – arrests that a deputy sheriff often made on his own.  It seemed kind of demeaning.  In my 'first office,' I remember arresting a selective service violator, a Jehovah’s Witness.  I had previously talked to him and his mother on the telephone.  They were both cooperative.  I said I would come by the house and get him, take him for processing.  The supervisor made me take two other Agents for ‘back up’ and to insure he was properly handcuffed.  It was embarrassing.  The kid was upset.  The mother was upset.  Both seemed like very nice people.  I did apologize to the mother and made some lame excuse for why this was necessary.

Now, it would seem that the Bureau has carried on that same tradition or mind set on steroids… with SWAT teams sent to almost all arrests.  Why?  The Agents' pool, in large part, has morphed into something like ‘girly men.’  I know that term might get me in trouble.  However, they seemed to get away with it on Saturday Night Live.  So, I will give it a try.  But, to clarify, I worked with women Agents, and for the most part, they did not fit in that category.  It generally fits the type of men (and some women) presently recruited.  Which explains why they send a SWAT Team to make the most mundane arrests.  And, it explains why the shooting requirements for Agents have sunk to comical lows.

 

To be continued…

 

True Nelson

The FBI... What in the World is Going On?

 

The FBI… I was an Agent in the 70s.  I am proud of my service.  And, I must say that the experience and connections I gained there greatly enhanced my subsequent career.  Although, early on, being inside the FBI (at the time) was disillusioning in many aspects.  That said, the quality of the men and women in the Bureau, the Agents, generally was pretty high – except for a few.  In that era, many had been officers in the military; but we had former teachers, accountants, and some attorneys.  Which reminds me of a humorous story.  I will digress for a moment.

Awhile back, I was having some physical therapy on my knee.  The therapist, a nice young woman, was asking me about my earlier life… what I did for employment, etc.  I mentioned that I had been a deputy sheriff, a military officer, and an FBI Agent.  She was interested in the FBI aspect.  She said are you an attorney?  I said that I was not.  She said I thought you had to be an attorney to be an Agent.  I responded that was not the case; and that, in my experience, the former attorneys usually turned out to be the worst Agents.  She said, “Oh… my dad is an attorney – and graduated from Harvard Law School.”

Yes, it was an awkward moment.  The only thing I could think to say at the time was, ‘your dad must be a very smart guy.’  She was kind of coolish after that, did not talk much, and I never went back to her.

Nonetheless, my opinion on attorneys in the FBI, and in general, remains the same.  They are ‘hired guns’ that generally have little ethical compass.  Well, ‘hired Guns’ is probably a considerable mischaracterization as far as the Bureau is concerned.  I should describe them more accurately as men and women that are uncomfortable with guns; as well as the requirement to deal appropriately with undesirables, aka the criminal element.  However, former attorneys are generally good at talking, or should I say pontificating, but deficient in many other aspects.  Unfortunately, the talking part often gets one promoted in the Bureau.  But, for those so inclined, it means you do not have to do the scary part.  You can just talk tough and assign someone else to handle it.

This is perhaps the long way around, but I plan to talk about the current FBI and how disappointed I am in the organization’s leadership, particularly Christopher Wray.

To be continued…

True Nelson

Zachariah Peterson (JUDICIAL FOLLOWUP SUMMARY) Threatened to mow down Teachers!

 

In that there has been considerable recent interest in my old blog posts concerning Zackariah Peterson; I thought I would update the judicial process posted in the OregonianLive newsfeed dated 7-28-16 (Maxine Bernstein reporting).  I kind of loss tract of the case over the years.  Hopefully, Peterson has moved on to a responsible and productive life upon serving his sentence.

 

Bernstein quote:  "Upon arrest, Peterson admitted to police that he had left the voicemail messages and wrote the online post, that he had been drinking and had no intention of acting out on his threats. Police found firearms in his home and seized them, including a 12-gauge shotgun, .22-caliber pistol, a 7mm rifle, and a .22-caliber rifle. He was taken into federal custody on Sept. 11, 2015.”

“In March, he pleaded guilty to felon in possession of a firearm and threatening communication in interstate commerce.”

" I'd like to take the opportunity to apologize,'' Peterson, 30, said in court, addressing several parents from the school, the principal and a math teacher. "When I realized what I'd done, I felt horrible about it. I can't imagine how it made you all feel. I just can't believe what I did.''

"A defense-hired psychologist, Scott Senn, testified that Peterson is extremely bright but struggles with alcoholism, intimacy and emotions. He was scarred as a child, and the bullying went unaddressed."

"Assistant U.S. Attorney Greg Nyhus and Assistant U.S Attorney Mackeson jointly recommended a sentence of one year and nine months."

"But U.S. District Judge Anna J. Brown calculated Peterson's offense level differently, with an enhancement due to his possession of what she considered a .22-caliber rifle with a high-capacity magazine. She also noted that Peterson, who was convicted of a felony in 2006, wasn't allowed to possess any guns."

"The threat conveyed is appalling...words used were as bad as you can imagine, especially in today's climate," the judge said. "I appreciate those who felt the sting and horror and alarm from his remarks and want to be protected."

"But Brown said she can't ignore an evaluation that found Peterson is at a low risk of re-offending. She said she believes that if his mental health issues and alcohol problem is addressed, he should be able to return to pursuing his Ph.D. when he's completed his sentence."

"I'm very shameful of this. All of this here today happened because I was too proud to seek help that I knew I needed for my drinking and mental health issues,'' Peterson said, standing before the judge moments before she issued her sentence. "I should have known better than to create this situation...If there is one benefit for having been incarcerated for almost a year is I'm sober.''

True Nelson

True's Miscellany: Gun Control Issues; The Biden Crime Family or 'Boys will be Boys'; and COVID

Sometimes it seems that there are so many things to talk about that it defies talking about it.  Moreover, no one particularly wants to hear what you have to say.  But, I have my blog and it is my outlet.

The gun issue:  Everyone, mostly people that know practically nothing about guns, have an emphatic answer to curbing gun violence which they are more than happy to share.  That said, I kind of feel that I have a certain amount of expertise (perhaps I am presuming too much); but I do have 10 years in law enforcement and during which period I was an FBI Firearms Instructor, as well as a member of a SWAT team.  Subsequently, for most of my career, I was in corporate security for a Fortune 100 company; and (I suppose not too surprisingly) ‘workplace’ violence prevention was a priority.  Yes, and I was in the military, and we did use M-16s.  But no one is particularly interested in my opinion, if it in anyway conflicts with their own.

Asked to define the dreaded “assault weapon” on everyone’s mind these days, they generally are referring to the AR-15.  “It looks dangerous.”  And, it is dangerous.  But all guns, generally speaking, in the wrong hands are dangerous.  But, you opine, ‘It’s a ‘military assault weapon.’  Well, not exactly.  Did you know that the AR-15 is not modeled after the M-16?  Did you know, or even care, that the AR-15 predated the M-16?  Nonetheless, those who know little about guns want to deal in generalities that have no relevance to any sort of legal definition of what constitutes an ‘assault weapon.’  It gets kind of tiresome, even hopeless, to discuss.  I’ve written extensively on ‘gun control’ and, if you’re interested, go to my blog’s ‘side bar’ and type in ‘gun control.’  I’ve had a lot to say on the subject.  There are some things we can do to prevent ‘school shootings.’  Let’s just do it with a modicum of expertise involved.

And, if you want my opinion on the AR-15… Well, I think that anyone who would purchase an AR-15, in view of the rifle’s bad reputation, is kind of a ‘knucklehead.’  Best not mention your purchase in public.

The Biden Family:  Could we describe said clan as a ‘organized crime family?’  Well, I might.  Others might qualify the Bidens’ many questionable and even illegal acts as ‘just politics.’  Sort of like breezily discounting it as ‘boys will be boys.’  As a result, giving Joe, Hunter and Jim Biden the benefit of the doubt as ‘just politics;’ and furthermore accepting the belief that there are many other politicians doing the same thing.  Well, you’ve got me there.  Yes indeed, Al Capone would fit right in as a politician.  But he’s passed on to his reward.  My concerns are that it seems the FBI and Secret Service are in on it.  Who is watching out for the public?  It appears no one.  It would be interesting to know how all the money pouring into the Biden Family is ‘laundered.’  Does the IRS look the other way?  God help us.

Covid:  Just had a bout with said disease.  As you might have noted, I survived.  It wasn’t too bad.  Sort of like a bad cold, runny nose with lots of coughing.  Interestingly after four Covid vaccinations, I still acquired Covid.  Whatever they injected into us, maybe they should call it something other than a vaccination.  What if they told us, when we received our Polio vaccination years back, that this will not prevent you from getting Polio, but you probably won’t die?  Or the Smallpox vaccination, or Whooping Cough?  Oh well, I did not die.  I’m thankful for that.

 

True Nelson