I don’t know if you saw the picture of Harvey Weinstein on
the cover of Time Magazine’s October 23rd issue - worse than the one depicted at right. Maybe, Time Magazine's was just an especially bad picture. Maybe, Harvey is not particularly photogenic. Perhaps it was the lighting. Let's hope so. Most women's worst nightmare - considering the alleged circumstances.
Anyway, I do have a suggestion for Mr. Weinstein. It kind of reminds me of the downfall and disgrace of one
of Oregon’s premier politicians, Neil Goldschmidt. So... Harvey, how about taking your money and moving to France?
Goldschmidt was the Mayor of Portland, U.S. Secretary of
Transportation in the Carter Administration, and was elected the 33rd
Governor of Oregon in 1986.
Goldschmidt was accused of (and he subsequently admitted in
a rationalized sort of way) having an “affair,” as he described it, with a 13
year old girl – a friend of the family – which extended over several years. Many prominent people, including the future
Sheriff of Multnomah County (Bernie Giusto) knew of the abuse early on.
Furthermore, the abuse by Goldschmidt was reportedly well
known in political circles. But, you
understand, Goldschmidt was a ‘high roller,’ ‘a rising star’ and it just made
sense for many to keep their mouths shut to protect their careers.
Neil’s ‘indiscretion,’ all came out in the end, documented
in articles in the Willamette Week newspaper – a local weekly publication.
Nigel Jaquis, a Willamette Week reporter, based on rumors,
followed up on the story years later; and subsequently won a Pulitzer Prize for
‘investigative journalism.’ This was
several years after the abuse had ended.
And, Elizabeth (the victim) at that point, well into adulthood,
cooperated with the reporter. She
advised that Goldschmidt had paid her money to keep quiet. She named people who knew. Everything
unraveled.
Sadly, Elizabeth later drifted into alcohol and drug abuse
and died at a young age. The ‘statute of
limitations’ protected Goldschmidt from prosecution.
I understand Goldschmidt (maybe I’m wrong) moved to France
and established a residence there. Now in
his late 70’s, he is financially well off and basically keeping a low profile.
The bottom line is that there is nothing particularly new
in Harvey Weinstein’s situation (that's Hollywood); and this could also be said about
politics. Does anyone remember William
Jefferson Clinton?
Could it be that a principal, inexcusable wrong was that those other than the immediate victims, accessories so to speak, kept quiet to
protect their own butts?
True Nelson
No comments:
Post a Comment