Oregon Election Results (2022) - Disappointing

 

The results of the recent election (2022) were a little surprising to me and somewhat disappointing.  It seems the good old US of A is continuing to trend downward – just my opinion.  With the Democrats still apparently hanging on to the catbird’s seat – assuming they take the Senate as is anticipated – we can look forward to more crime, more illegal drugs, more illegal immigration, higher inflation, unrestricted abortions up to the moment of birth, and more socialism promulgated.  Incidentally, Oregon passed, what is considered to be, the strictest gun control measures in the country.  Is gun registration the prelude to confiscation?  Perhaps.

That said, it appears that everyone, with the possible exception of 'the ordinary' Oregon citizen, got something – perhaps the repercussions are yet to be known.  I’m trying to be circumspect about the situation.  I was but a wee babe when WWII ended.  In life, I had good parents and grandparents, many good friends, and received a Bachelor’s and Master’s Degree at a price I could swing while I worked full time.  Furthermore, I have had a wonderful wife of more than 50 years and, all things considered, a good life.  All I can say is ‘good luck’ Oregon.  You’ll need it.

One more thing, I believe there is the underlying issue of Donald Trump – his influence on the 2022 election and his apparent intention to run for President again.  I don’t believe his participation was particularly helpful this election.  I am hopeful that he will not run in 2024; and if he does (regardless of his Democratic opponent) I think he will lose.  I voted for him the first time… or perhaps I voted against Hillary Clinton.. perhaps both.  And I think Trump was a pretty good President; but his time has passed.

True Nelson

The Abortion Issue in the Coming Election (November 2022)

 

The November (2022) election is near. And, to say that this election is important might very well be something of an understatement.

What about me? What do I think? I am starting to lose faith in the American voters. Why? Well, there is ‘inflation,’ ‘unprecedented increases in crime,’ ‘overwhelming illegal immigration, ‘fentanyl overdoses in hundreds of thousands; stock market and retirement funds collapsing in value; and the voting public, it seems, are preoccupied, and divided by the issue of ‘abortion.’  There for, the abortion issue might decide the election outcome.

OK, let us consider the abortion issue:

Recently, The U.S. Supreme Court found Roe v. Wade to be unconstitutional. And that, the question of abortion rights, or lack thereof, should be decided by each State.

Hardly, a crisis in Oregon; but many think it is… or more likely they wish to make it a crisis. I am in Oregon, so I would like to give you a little history of abortion in this state:

1969:  Oregon became one of the first states to legalize abortion. SB 193 legalized abortion during the first 150 days of pregnancy (5 months). Under the following circumstances:

*The baby has a physical or mental handicap

*The baby was conceived by rape or other criminal intercourse (to include statutory rape, prostitution, incest, etc.)

*The pregnancy poses a substantial risk to the mother’s physical or mental health.

1973:  Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton established abortion on-demand in America from conception to birth.

1983:  SB 397 repealed the 1969 law, along with all restriction on abortion. The bill was passed for the expressed purpose of protecting unrestricted abortion in Oregon if Roe/Doe were ever overturned.

2017:  HB 3391 forces insurance companies operating in Oregon to fully cover abortion procedures with no co-pay or deductible. The law also expanded taxpayer funding of abortion, effectually making abortion free in Oregon.

MY OPINION:  It is very unlikely that abortion would ever be entirely banned in Oregon; but if common decency were to prevail, some restrictions would/should be made.

In my opinion, only a fanatical proponent of eugenics or a sociopathic personality would promote the killing of a baby at the moment of birth. Is there anyone among us that cruel, that insensitive? Yes, of course there are people like that. On the other hand, most believe, under certain circumstances, abortion is warranted. And, most also believe there are other more humane guidelines to limit abortion.

I believe that an abortion should be available, with restrictions incorporated. The 1969 law, modified in some respects by medical professionals, might be a place to start. Unrestricted abortion, to me would be, and is, unconscionable.

 

The FBI... What in the World is Going On? (Part 3 / Conclusion)

 

                                                                                                            

The current dubious status of the Federal Bureau of Investigation is without question due to… leadership.  Most of you have figured this out already.  The Director is Christopher Wray.  Is he qualified to be the Director?  Well, let’s see:  The FBI has approximately 25,000 employees.  About 11 or 12 thousand are Agents.  The remainder being support personnel.

So, is Wray qualified and experienced enough to lead such a mammoth organization?  To evaluate that, we need to know something about his background.  Wray comes from a wealthy family and his father is an attorney in a prestigious law firm.  Wray was sent to a private school, the Phillips Academy in Massachusetts.  I understand this is a tony school for kids from prominent (aka wealthy) families.  He went from said preparatory school to Yale where he got a degree... in philosophy.  I went to a public college.  I wasn’t even aware that they had a degree in philosophy.  At least it never crossed my mind.  I had to look this up.  It turns out that a degree in Philosophy is not that useful in most areas of occupational endeavor; but you do become an interesting conversationalist with the ability to understand and consider both sides of a discussion.  From there he went to Yale’s Law School and yada, yada, yada.

Being a connected young man, he found ready employment as an attorney and then as an Assistant United States Attorney.  Doors opened… well you know how it goes.  OK, what’s my point?  The point is that prior to becoming Director of the FBI, he had supervised (and I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt on this) no more than 25 or 30 employees.  Suddenly, he was put in charge of 25,000.  Can you see why there might be a problem here?

Chris Wray may be a nice man, but he is way over his head; and, as a result, easily manipulated by others around him.  I’m sure he was never particularly interested in being FBI Director and probably still isn’t; but he is interested in an illustrious, lucrative, subsequent career in the federal government or with a pricey law firm.  For his ambition, the men and women of the FBI suffer the inescapable indignities and perception of being politically biased… which unfortunately, under current management, they are.

So, where do you find a good, qualified FBI Director.  My suggestion is that they look for him or her, in a highly considered law enforcement agency, or perhaps the military.  After all, aren’t they looking for a leader rather than a politician with no background in leadership.  Do you think Wray got his job due to his resume?  I don’t think so.

Well, you might say… Trump picked him.  That’s true.  But maybe Wray’s most prominent qualification for selection was that he was perceived to be easily manipulated – which has proven also to be true… in spades.

True Nelson

The FBI…What in the World is Going On? (Part 2)

  

I only served under Hoover for a short period of time.  He died about five or six months after I entered the Bureau.  It could be correctly stated that he ruled the Bureau and his Agents with an iron hand.  The rules for conduct were extensive, extreme and some bordered on the eccentric.  For example:  Agents were not allowed coffee breaks while on duty - that was in or out of the office.  I soon learned that said rule was often, almost universally, ignored by the Agents.  Nonetheless, if caught by a supervisor, you could be officially censured; and if on probation status at the time, it could mean 'adios.'

Another requirement, more difficult to circumvent, was that New Agents were limited to how long they could be in the Office.  Reason given:  FBI Agents do not solve cases in the office.  I recall the Time in Office (TIO) allowed was about 10% of the workday.  That was approximately an hour because ten-hour days were expected.  For new Agents with no assigned car, this was a problem; and often meant standing at the front door in the morning waiting for a more senior Agent to arrive and ask (beg) to use their car for part of the day to cover leads.  If that failed the public library was a place to work on reports.  And yes, you had to walk.  This was the typical 'First Office' which lasted about nine to ten months.  Finishing that, you were assigned a 'Second Office.'  In my case, it was San Francisco.  I felt that I had hit the jackpot.  That's when, finally, they treated you like a regular Agent... and cars were available.

I had been a deputy sheriff, prior to the military, and before I entered the Bureau.  It was the Bureau’s custom or policy to send five or six Agents to make an arrest – arrests that a deputy sheriff often made on his own.  It seemed kind of demeaning.  In my 'first office,' I remember arresting a selective service violator, a Jehovah’s Witness.  I had previously talked to him and his mother on the telephone.  They were both cooperative.  I said I would come by the house and get him, take him for processing.  The supervisor made me take two other Agents for ‘back up’ and to insure he was properly handcuffed.  It was embarrassing.  The kid was upset.  The mother was upset.  Both seemed like very nice people.  I did apologize to the mother and made some lame excuse for why this was necessary.

Now, it would seem that the Bureau has carried on that same tradition or mind set on steroids… with SWAT teams sent to almost all arrests.  Why?  The Agents' pool, in large part, has morphed into something like ‘girly men.’  I know that term might get me in trouble.  However, they seemed to get away with it on Saturday Night Live.  So, I will give it a try.  But, to clarify, I worked with women Agents, and for the most part, they did not fit in that category.  It generally fits the type of men (and some women) presently recruited.  Which explains why they send a SWAT Team to make the most mundane arrests.  And, it explains why the shooting requirements for Agents have sunk to comical lows.

 

To be continued…

 

True Nelson

The FBI... What in the World is Going On?

 

The FBI… I was an Agent in the 70s.  I am proud of my service.  And, I must say that the experience and connections I gained there greatly enhanced my subsequent career.  Although, early on, being inside the FBI (at the time) was disillusioning in many aspects.  That said, the quality of the men and women in the Bureau, the Agents, generally was pretty high – except for a few.  In that era, many had been officers in the military; but we had former teachers, accountants, and some attorneys.  Which reminds me of a humorous story.  I will digress for a moment.

Awhile back, I was having some physical therapy on my knee.  The therapist, a nice young woman, was asking me about my earlier life… what I did for employment, etc.  I mentioned that I had been a deputy sheriff, a military officer, and an FBI Agent.  She was interested in the FBI aspect.  She said are you an attorney?  I said that I was not.  She said I thought you had to be an attorney to be an Agent.  I responded that was not the case; and that, in my experience, the former attorneys usually turned out to be the worst Agents.  She said, “Oh… my dad is an attorney – and graduated from Harvard Law School.”

Yes, it was an awkward moment.  The only thing I could think to say at the time was, ‘your dad must be a very smart guy.’  She was kind of coolish after that, did not talk much, and I never went back to her.

Nonetheless, my opinion on attorneys in the FBI, and in general, remains the same.  They are ‘hired guns’ that generally have little ethical compass.  Well, ‘hired Guns’ is probably a considerable mischaracterization as far as the Bureau is concerned.  I should describe them more accurately as men and women that are uncomfortable with guns; as well as the requirement to deal appropriately with undesirables, aka the criminal element.  However, former attorneys are generally good at talking, or should I say pontificating, but deficient in many other aspects.  Unfortunately, the talking part often gets one promoted in the Bureau.  But, for those so inclined, it means you do not have to do the scary part.  You can just talk tough and assign someone else to handle it.

This is perhaps the long way around, but I plan to talk about the current FBI and how disappointed I am in the organization’s leadership, particularly Christopher Wray.

To be continued…

True Nelson

Zachariah Peterson (JUDICIAL FOLLOWUP SUMMARY) Threatened to mow down Teachers!

 

In that there has been considerable recent interest in my old blog posts concerning Zackariah Peterson; I thought I would update the judicial process posted in the OregonianLive newsfeed dated 7-28-16 (Maxine Bernstein reporting).  I kind of loss tract of the case over the years.  Hopefully, Peterson has moved on to a responsible and productive life upon serving his sentence.

 

Bernstein quote:  "Upon arrest, Peterson admitted to police that he had left the voicemail messages and wrote the online post, that he had been drinking and had no intention of acting out on his threats. Police found firearms in his home and seized them, including a 12-gauge shotgun, .22-caliber pistol, a 7mm rifle, and a .22-caliber rifle. He was taken into federal custody on Sept. 11, 2015.”

“In March, he pleaded guilty to felon in possession of a firearm and threatening communication in interstate commerce.”

" I'd like to take the opportunity to apologize,'' Peterson, 30, said in court, addressing several parents from the school, the principal and a math teacher. "When I realized what I'd done, I felt horrible about it. I can't imagine how it made you all feel. I just can't believe what I did.''

"A defense-hired psychologist, Scott Senn, testified that Peterson is extremely bright but struggles with alcoholism, intimacy and emotions. He was scarred as a child, and the bullying went unaddressed."

"Assistant U.S. Attorney Greg Nyhus and Assistant U.S Attorney Mackeson jointly recommended a sentence of one year and nine months."

"But U.S. District Judge Anna J. Brown calculated Peterson's offense level differently, with an enhancement due to his possession of what she considered a .22-caliber rifle with a high-capacity magazine. She also noted that Peterson, who was convicted of a felony in 2006, wasn't allowed to possess any guns."

"The threat conveyed is appalling...words used were as bad as you can imagine, especially in today's climate," the judge said. "I appreciate those who felt the sting and horror and alarm from his remarks and want to be protected."

"But Brown said she can't ignore an evaluation that found Peterson is at a low risk of re-offending. She said she believes that if his mental health issues and alcohol problem is addressed, he should be able to return to pursuing his Ph.D. when he's completed his sentence."

"I'm very shameful of this. All of this here today happened because I was too proud to seek help that I knew I needed for my drinking and mental health issues,'' Peterson said, standing before the judge moments before she issued her sentence. "I should have known better than to create this situation...If there is one benefit for having been incarcerated for almost a year is I'm sober.''

True Nelson

True's Miscellany: Gun Control Issues; The Biden Crime Family or 'Boys will be Boys'; and COVID

Sometimes it seems that there are so many things to talk about that it defies talking about it.  Moreover, no one particularly wants to hear what you have to say.  But, I have my blog and it is my outlet.

The gun issue:  Everyone, mostly people that know practically nothing about guns, have an emphatic answer to curbing gun violence which they are more than happy to share.  That said, I kind of feel that I have a certain amount of expertise (perhaps I am presuming too much); but I do have 10 years in law enforcement and during which period I was an FBI Firearms Instructor, as well as a member of a SWAT team.  Subsequently, for most of my career, I was in corporate security for a Fortune 100 company; and (I suppose not too surprisingly) ‘workplace’ violence prevention was a priority.  Yes, and I was in the military, and we did use M-16s.  But no one is particularly interested in my opinion, if it in anyway conflicts with their own.

Asked to define the dreaded “assault weapon” on everyone’s mind these days, they generally are referring to the AR-15.  “It looks dangerous.”  And, it is dangerous.  But all guns, generally speaking, in the wrong hands are dangerous.  But, you opine, ‘It’s a ‘military assault weapon.’  Well, not exactly.  Did you know that the AR-15 is not modeled after the M-16?  Did you know, or even care, that the AR-15 predated the M-16?  Nonetheless, those who know little about guns want to deal in generalities that have no relevance to any sort of legal definition of what constitutes an ‘assault weapon.’  It gets kind of tiresome, even hopeless, to discuss.  I’ve written extensively on ‘gun control’ and, if you’re interested, go to my blog’s ‘side bar’ and type in ‘gun control.’  I’ve had a lot to say on the subject.  There are some things we can do to prevent ‘school shootings.’  Let’s just do it with a modicum of expertise involved.

And, if you want my opinion on the AR-15… Well, I think that anyone who would purchase an AR-15, in view of the rifle’s bad reputation, is kind of a ‘knucklehead.’  Best not mention your purchase in public.

The Biden Family:  Could we describe said clan as a ‘organized crime family?’  Well, I might.  Others might qualify the Bidens’ many questionable and even illegal acts as ‘just politics.’  Sort of like breezily discounting it as ‘boys will be boys.’  As a result, giving Joe, Hunter and Jim Biden the benefit of the doubt as ‘just politics;’ and furthermore accepting the belief that there are many other politicians doing the same thing.  Well, you’ve got me there.  Yes indeed, Al Capone would fit right in as a politician.  But he’s passed on to his reward.  My concerns are that it seems the FBI and Secret Service are in on it.  Who is watching out for the public?  It appears no one.  It would be interesting to know how all the money pouring into the Biden Family is ‘laundered.’  Does the IRS look the other way?  God help us.

Covid:  Just had a bout with said disease.  As you might have noted, I survived.  It wasn’t too bad.  Sort of like a bad cold, runny nose with lots of coughing.  Interestingly after four Covid vaccinations, I still acquired Covid.  Whatever they injected into us, maybe they should call it something other than a vaccination.  What if they told us, when we received our Polio vaccination years back, that this will not prevent you from getting Polio, but you probably won’t die?  Or the Smallpox vaccination, or Whooping Cough?  Oh well, I did not die.  I’m thankful for that.

 

True Nelson